Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[MT]

Hi,
just created a model of dual system (0 layers) reusing exhaust. Also drawed expected water levels and pod positions for all steps. Needed 2hours to draw it     Each square is air or water. If water than it = 1kg. Each square is 10cm=0.1m high.

I decided to not post yet complete energy in/out calculations as I'm not sure how to calculate work done while injecting water.

In Precharge step 8 liter if water is injected in the inlet. Columns 1 and 22 are connected so water rises 4 stories  high in both.

Have 2 questions:
1. What is the potential energy of water in both columns
Ep = m*g*h = 1 * 10 * h

EpColumn1= 4 + 3 + 2 +1 = 10
EpColumn22= 4 + 3 + 2 +1 = 10
Ep = 20  is this correct?

2. Is potential energy gained under ideal equal to the work done?
I think yes for precharge step. What do you think?

respect,
Marcel

[wildew]

@RED_SUNSET
I for one have found your input helpful and I also agree with many of your frustrations. This is a rather different group than any of the other forms I'm a member of, ALL forums have a distinct personality. Personal choice to remain a member or not. And if I'm the person that has you puzzled because I "build without understanding" - sorry, don't know any other way.

That does raise a point I find both amusing and confusing; a year from now, if this plays out to the point of modifying / amending / adding to certain rules of physics... Any one with an interest will be able to study the principles, theories and dynamics all at once . The entire documentation will be available with the diagrams and examples well defined and illustrated for the simple minded like me.

I have not once complained about the way this is being handled now or demanded answers or proof. I've asked several questions and done my best to understand the answers. I fully intend to continue "being me" to the end.

Won't be the first time I've taken a "risky" approach to solving a problem and I often DO find the solution.

Dale

[neptune]

@Red_Sunset. I do hope you will find the time to pop in now and then. IMO your contribution has been very valuable. Regarding building without understanding. As Wildew says, that is the only way for some of us. Then there who build thinking they understand all, but do not. I say, full marks to those who at least try to build, whatever their level of understanding. They are bound to learn something, and in the process may teach the rest of us.

[ramset]

Michel
Why? [your post 1996]
I like to think of it as a Balance....
besides ..    the experience builds muscles and keeps us grounded in reality !

Very true your observation about sharing..... "giving it away" to keep it !!

On to whom so ever much is given much is required!!

thx
Chet

PS

Secrets don't change things ,they just cause resentment and reinforce the status quo.
If you believe you understand the mechanism at work here?

SHARE.............{its good for the soul!:,}

[see3d]

I am running with 4 risers now and am back to using a reservoir that I raise and lower for the input.

webby1,
The description you give is generally consistent with my expectations, based on my simulation. 

You say you have a 4 riser system.  However, I believe it can be a 1, 2, 3, or 4 riser system just by leaving out the water in the outside water pockets.  That leaves the free air able to go to any inner riser you want as the last one.

An interesting experiment would be to measure the difference in operation between a 1, 2, 3, or 4 riser system, keeping everything else the same -- assuming you don't blow the skirt of the last one.

If you have the time to make some measurements in a 1 riser configuration, I could use those to help verify my simulation.

Let me know if you would be willing to do that.

Thanks,

Dennis