Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[telecom]

@Telecom. As far as I can see the maths seem to stack up in favour of this system. We have some pretty good anecdotal evidence, and the opinion of Mark Dansie. Until and unless someone replicates this, then we are not going to know anything for certain. Simple at first glance, as ever the devil is in the detail. We have been told that we need close gaps between risers and the walls containing the rings of water , so one of the main problems is we need custom made cylinders .
        I was interested to see that you include gravity in your list of open systems. As someone said earlier, buoyancy is just gravity misspelt.

Hi Neptune & everybody,
can someone please provide a clear diagram with explanations?
So far what I see in a post 528 looks like a normal air over oil system with multiple pistons. Used in car lifts, for example...

To control gravity, it has to be shielded. There is a website dedicated to this:
www.blazelabs.com

[mondrasek]

Hi Neptune & everybody,
can someone please provide a clear diagram with explanations?
So far what I see in a post 528 looks like a normal air over oil system with multiple pistons. Used in car lifts, for example...

To control gravity, it has to be shielded. There is a website dedicated to this:
www.blazelabs.com

Hi telecom. 

I think if we could explain this with just a clear diagram we would.  But, then again, this unique construction would have been found years ago.  That is always the argument, right?

This device is extremely interesting so far, at least to me.  The "simple maths" support it.  At least the simple maths that I have performed.

If you start with the taught "rule" that a "Conservative Field of Force" like gravity cannot do Work, then you must dismiss this idea outright.  That is exactly what I would have done prior to running some calcs.

My Father taught me his understanding of buoyancy when I was a child (maybe 40 years ago?):  The weight of the water displaced by any buoyant body is equal to the amount of weight it can support from sinking.

I believe my Father's interpretation of Archimedes is correct.  But now I am seeing a new construction that shows what I believe to be an "addendum" to that explanation.

One of the reasons I never considered buoyancy to be a possible method for doing work was just because my Father, and several year of Engineering school, all taught that this was the case.  So far with Mr. Wayne's construction, I am pleasantly amused to find that we may have been wrong.  Maybe if we had not been taught that "it was not possible" more individuals would have looked for a way and maybe found this way earlier?

I still look forward to more info and demonstrations from Mr. Wayne.

I am sorry I cannot provide a way for you to understand this system.  I was hoping that a physical model and maybe some animations would help, but I (personally) cannot provide those.  I believe they will appear soon, however.

M.

[LarryC]

Model buiding hopefully made easier.

Cylinders are the idea containers for high pressure, but since the model will not have high pressures, it seems it could be made square or rectangular shaped. So cut acrylic pieces and glue.
The pressure should still keep the side surfaces centered, but if it is a problem, spacers could be added.

Anybody, see any problems?

Regards, Larry

[mondrasek]

Double post.  Sorry.

[mondrasek]

@LarryC,

I see no problem with making everything from acrylic sheet.  But unless you have perfect machining capabilities, a box is the hardest thing to make.

How do you recommend we bond the pieces?  If it is with something "glue like" such as silicone, that may disrupt an individual's ability to see clearly all the operations through multiple layers of acrylic and water.

I had hoped to see something made more like this:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT6Ow_cBTps

But that is just me.  I would welcome anything that helped others to understand.  I mean, I'm definitely not a teacher, so those who teach should explain what would be the best teaching aid.

Thanks,

M.