Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[MileHigh]

Wayne:

My system does have a small 12v battery, to run the HMI, that runs the valves and track the data.

Something most people realize - that we are running a hydraulic motor - Self powered, a Generator - self powered, - a dual pumping system with a surface area of 525 inches - self powered, a HMI with to valves 25 sensors and self powered - hydraulics self powered, and burning two light bulbs self powered .....while creating a force of 5500 pounds and capturing it - self powered.....

Is "HMI" human-machine interface?  If the valves are solenoid valves don't they consume a moderate amount of power when they are energized?  Do you know what your average battery power consumption is?

Reading your quote above I can speculate something like this:

<unknown energy source> -> dual pumping system -> hydraulic motor -> generator -> two light bulbs

So is the "unknown energy source" your special effect in action?  Honestly, it looks like a really tempting place to put a tank of pressurized air.

Note you say the HMI and the valves and sensors are powered by the battery, and then you say the HMI and valves and sensors are "self powered."  So which is it?

while creating a force of 5500 pounds and capturing it - self powered.....

The above statement doesn't make any sense.  Just mentioning force alone has no meaning.

Do you have any preliminary specifications for your device?  As you can see from above, there are several issues with your quoted text.

Thanks,

MileHigh

[Lakes]

Gen charges the battery to drive the control system?

Video cam + Ustream to show 24/7 working?

[mrwayne]

Hello Milehigh,

You missed the point, so I must be very poor at explaining things.
here is what I was trying to point out - The ZED has no input and we have at least five clear energy conversions (losses), or power drains in the system, we are performing an enormous amount of work (more than a 3 inch by 4 inch 12volt battery can provide). 

Each of the components have ineffiecient systems in themselves - the sum total of losses through well known equipment - is more that the battery could handle - unless as you pointed out - hidden power - or excess energy from somehwere - in our case - The Travis Effect - fully understood and utilized.

Even in the video Mark Dansie made of the last model, back in november, Mark laughed in the video about our weights - (which were a successful attempt to capture the ramp of the power curve at long strokes - they are gone because I invented a better solution with our new one ZED).

To the observed and unnoticed point:
You see - we were moving 900 pounds of weight back and forth - continuosly - self sustained - free energy and all the things (losses) I mentioned above about this unit.

If the only thing you knew was that we were moving the weight (just the weight) completley free - you would realize you were seeing the potential source for abundant free energy that this world needs.
Some people see a water fall, wind, Solar, volcanic heat, all have potential - all have one common attribute - work is being done - with no input from us.

I saw the potential in a the Travis Effect, caused by gravity - we just had to think of a way to capture it - and after much expense (nearly a half million dollars) and hard work - thousands of experiments - we succedded. (I have had nearly 100 people volunteer, and help through the process).

The best part is - the resiliance of the design - we do not have a system that barely runs and slowly runs down - what good is that? We have one that we are scalling to meet the power demand.
We overcome obvious losses in the system and then do extra work.

I am glad if you can see it, it is for the world,  what is right before our eyes - is the future of energy production  - one day - believer or not - you will at least be able to tell your grandkids - I was there.

Pressurized tank - Ok - you got me - did not think anyone would notice that lol
But seriously I do get your point, and I respect it - to be clear - We have had complete and unimpeded full and thorough inspection of our systems. If you were under NDA, you could check for yourself.

I understand first - you have not had complete access - uninhibited access.
He who has nothing to hide - behaves accordingly - but professionally with due dillignese NDA.

Do not forget - We prove it on paper using simple and also complex physics. (note to future free energy inventors - if it does not work in the simple math - it will not get better in the complex).

We have fully modeled the scalability of the system of 25kw, 50kw, and 100kw systems.
It take about 45 minutes to explain the succesful use of the Travis effect - most of that time is explaining the progression of the machine how we overcome the inherint obsticles to it use.

At the end of the disclosure - a common statement is - "It is amazing it (free energy) is that simple" followed by "How did you think of it?"

Which I answer with lots and lots of trial, failure, persistance, and a big dose of God's blessing.

I am not going to dissapear and loose the web site like some else claimed, but I have taken two days out of my time while the crew performed DOE's without me - if you want to be kept up to date with our progress and partnerships

Write me at mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com
Ask Sandy to add you to our private update list.

Otherwise - God bless you all, I have enjoyed our time together.
Thank you Stefan for your part of all this.
Wayne

[sano]

In childhood, we had a toy. Bottle, the bottleneck (from wine) are filled with water. In it, we put a small bottle closed with an elastic surface. We have a small bottle filled with water with a little air. The bottle had to float in water. If we push the stopper in a large bottle (we have created pressure), a small bottle went down like a stone. If we allowed the stopper (we created a vacuum) competed bottle quickly to the surface. I think it is the principle of work ZED.
Sorry for my imperfect English.

[neptune]

What Sano is describing is a toy "diver". We used to use the globe of a torch bulb with the brass bit removed . You placed it in a bottle full of water . As you tightened the stopper, the diver would sink. Water was being forced into the bulb through a small hole in the glass at the bottom . Slackening the stopper caused the diver to rise.