Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mondrasek]

Wayne talks about "raising the pump" or injecting water not at the base of a water column, but at a point higher up. In a ZED we cannot inject water into the side wall of the inner chamber, there are things in the way. So I assume Wayne means that water is injected via a pipe through the base of the chamber which projects upwards to the required point. More later when I have studied more .

@neptune,  I think you only need to plumb the water exchange pipe to the bottom of the center section of the ZED.  But the physical pump is then raised to the correct height that the head pressure of the water column from the elevated pump system to the bottom of the ZED is equalizing an optimal amount of the ZED operating water pressures.

M.

[neptune]

@Mondrasec.What you say about the input pump makes perfect sense. We are likely to understand more about this at a later stage when Wayne explaines his inverted pump scenario.


Looks like things are still on schedule for the Mark Dansie tests. The results of these tests will be a vital milestone. Public awareness of this technology is going to be an exponential curve. I would go so far as to say that once it has been in widespread use for 4 or 5 years, it might even get a small mention in mainstream media. I have always said that the first OU device to hit the market will cause changes on a scale that we are not capable of imagining.  It is going to make the Industrial Revolution seem like a vicarage tea party.

[LarryC]

On that note: does it amaze you yet on how much is going on in basically a single moving part (when they are attached together).

Wow, spend half of the day preparing for the hurricane and we get a Wayne storm of post. Thanks.

At first it did, but then it seemed it would be no difference if they are attached or separated by spacers and rising in unison, as long as the same surfaces areas receive the same PSI.

I'd liked to point out that it would not be a good idea to permanently attach on the acrylic model, it will need to be broken apart to repair leaks if they occur.

Regards, Larry

[mrwayne]

One point on Mark's visit,

Mark is a good skeptic - his aye on nay opens or closes the door to the access to the highest critiuqe.

Do not be misled into thinking that Mark's or any skeptics word will end speculation - that is not his purpose -
Mark's job is to route out the phoneys - the mistaken, and the confused and direct the real technology to those that can and will help.
When Mark's work is done - the real tests begin - and then you wll start to hear public non "fringe" discussions.
Wayne Travis

[neptune]

@mrwayne.Thanks for the remarks about Mark`s visit. Let us assume the Mark makes a favourable report, as I personally think he will. This will be a first step in the proverbial thousand mile journey. In some ways you will be in a worse position than Wilbur and Orville Wright. Whilst their achievement was momentous, it only made necessary the rewriting of books on aerodynamics. You have made it clear that you are not really interested in re-writing physics books, but what you are about to achieve will necessitate just that. As a side effect of what you set out to achieve, you are striking a body blow at the very heart and soul of physics as we know it . Rock solid concepts like entropy , and the laws of thermodynamics , are about to receive a strike that will rock them to their foundations. A lot of ivy league professors on fat salaries are going to be left wondering just what has happened.
        Do not expect an easy ride. Fasten your seatbelt. You do not strike me as being a quitter, so hang in there. I am with you all the way, and I am  not the only one.You have a tool that Wilbur and Orville did not have, The Internet.