No fall,no power...

[iacob alex]

......can be,in my opinion a first observation regarding the possibility to take out "free energy" from the gravity potential (statics).
     
       A longer fall means a greater velocity,so we can play more kinetic energy with our "toy"...

       A full up-down (180*) pendular fall ,is not alike a swinging balance...but you decide the way of acting :a power machine or a weight-measurement machine.

               All the best ! / Alex

[Airstriker]

Don't really understand your post. You want to show us something or are you another Archurian defeating Newtonians ?

[iacob alex]

   Hi !
There are a lot of topics,regarding the necessity to play a longer fall (for instance "Wheel vs. lever" and others...).
  All the best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

.....or give gravity time to act ("work") , so to develop self-motion in a continuous unbalanced arrangement .
We know that , a (single...) mass , if allowed to fall freely , " speeds " the vertical distance ( and kinetic energy...) proportional to the squared elapsed time , as follows :
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Falling_ball.jpg
We can take advantage from this increasing non-linear "stream" of "free" kinetic energy , and develop self-motion with the help of a simple continuous unbalanced configuration of two masses , playing variable/oscillatory leverage ( torque difference on the same side of the fulcrum ).
     Al_ex

[Thaelin]

Hi alex:
   And at the end of the fall you have to move the falling weight to a position that will take less power to re-lift it to the top again. Ever consider the geneva engine?  Has a lot of potential.