Overbalancing wheel

[Low-Q]

Unfortunately Vidar,
                           You have again missed out the fact, that TWO weights are moved AT THE SAME TIME,
one from the top, and one from the bottom --------- how is that moving one weight 1m, over and over
again, in order to gain an overbalancing force (?)  --------- of a device THAT ALREADY OVERBALANCES?
You yourself, have admitted, that my device already overbalances!
You need to seriously re-evaluate your reasoning.
Sorry Pal!

SPANG.         (BILL.)

No matter how I tried to explain my point, and no matter how you try to configure the weights, it be 1m, 52cm, two weights at the same time on top and the bottom - it does not matter. You try to achieve greater potential energy than what is limited by the span of the "wheel" and the given measurements of the weights. That is not possible. The span is fixed. Gravity is fixed. Weight of all the weights is fixed - fixed, locked, not changing. There is no way you can get more potential energy out of a system like that. I do not even have to understand your idea to say that IT JUST WONT WORK.

Anyways, I suggest you should build the machine and see for yourself. Then you'll probably get it

PS! No arguing, just very eager to make my point. Almost stubborn

Vidar

[SPANG]

Vidar,
       The long-standing argument I have with you, is simple; you say, that ANY overbalancing device,
cannot work if it does not contain POTENTIAL ENERGY.  As you know, I beg to differ!
If anyone else is of that thinking, then I feel sorry for you ,as you are limiting yourselves to other ways of
doing things ----- they may be unconventional ----- but so is perpetual motion!
From now on, maybe you Vidar, should be known as CAPTAIN POTENTIAL (?)
'Tis a shame, Vidar, to see a man of your obvious ability, to waste your time on obviously stupid ideas,
that end up with you 'going down the tubes'.

SPANG.         (BILL.)

[hartiberlin]

So still no video or graphics of it posted ?
How about posting at least a picture of the design ?

[SPANG]

Stephan,
            If you know of a way for me to 'post' my design, PLEASE let me know.  I have been told by your
forum, that my files are too big, and am therefor disallowed!
I could, I suppose, send the 'text' of my design, as a 'post', but I need a way to get my DRAWING on display.
The drawing itself, is on an A4 sized sheet of paper --------- this is the one the forum won't let me send.
I realy DO apreciate your 'showing an interest'.

THANKS,   SPANG.  (BILL.)       

[Low-Q]

Stephan,
            If you know of a way for me to 'post' my design, PLEASE let me know.  I have been told by your
forum, that my files are too big, and am therefor disallowed!
I could, I suppose, send the 'text' of my design, as a 'post', but I need a way to get my DRAWING on display.
The drawing itself, is on an A4 sized sheet of paper --------- this is the one the forum won't let me send.
I realy DO apreciate your 'showing an interest'.

THANKS,   SPANG.  (BILL.)       

You choose a lower resolution in your scanner software. Also, you can scan in greyscale. Reducing resolution from 300dpi to 72dpi will alone reduce the filesize to 1/18.

Or send the drawing to my e-mail, and I will be happy to resize the image for you, and post it in this thread.

Vidar