Overbalancing wheel

[SPANG]

 
To Johnny874   re; reply # 258
                                                  You say 'anxious',. but do you realy mean excited?  You also say, you'll keep quiet about it
for now.   Are you worried about ridicule?   If you are, DON'T BE!
There's an old saying of mine, that I use from time to time, it's this; re; P.M:   You can be wrong countless times, but you only
have to be right once!

BILL.

[SPANG]

To Everybody,
                       I, personaly, will carry on coming up with ideas, untill I DO get it right!
Don't forget, you only have to be right once.   There are, of course, skeptics, but just take a look at the amount of people,
who have viewed this thread, well over 23,000.    I should imagine, that the amount of skeptics out of this 'lot' ------------
is low.

BILL.

[Low-Q]

In the original drawing, submitted to Vidar, the extension-arms, are shown as dotted lines, and is much easier to understand,
perhaps when he gets his computer fixed ----------- he'll show you(?)

I replaced the dotted lines with grey lines, and the solid lines as black - just to save some time (Lazy me :-)). Regarding the understanding of the design I linked to, I'm not sure how to. I feel there are some issues with the design that I cannot point my finger on. Weights, repeating cycle - well, to me it boils down to moving weights up and down the same distance over and over again (Like watching this design from the side so I don't see the rotation). I mean, something should account for the over balanced part. I must imagine to remove all the weights except for one, and imagine how this single weight can gain kinetic energy just by repeating the cycle - it is hard for me to imagine such. Even with more weights, the total mass increase, the weights must account for themself, so to speak. My brain is simply blocking (Some kind of human anti virus software installed) the imagination on how this design can work.


Vidar

[SPANG]

 



Vidar,
       It is totaly clear, if one reads the text properly.   Don't misunderstand me, I'm NOT 'puting you down'.   I have come to
the conclusion, that you are reading the text incorrectly!   It doesn't matter how many weights/arms the device has on its
left-hand side ------------- their total (collective), distance from the hub, is LESS than the weights/arms on the right-hand
side.     This difference in distances occurs 'X' times per revolution ----------- all weights/arms, therefore repeat their positions
many times per revolution -------------- not ONCE per revolution, but many times!

BILL.

[Rafael Ti]

Il est pathfinder. J'aime son travail. Tres bon, n'est pas ?
http://besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3733

John, thank you for link. I appreciate it. Unfortunately I don't speak French , but... yes this man [pathfinder] is a very talented person I must say and his projects are really great. Amazing... he's built up all these devices one can see on photos. Analysing will be a great lesson of geometry and engineering.
I personally need to continue works on magnet motor. As for now believe in magnets as potential source of energy more than in gravity, especially after I've done some promissing experiments with bismuth as shielding.

Good luck all path finders...