PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[d3x0r]

d3,

There's several 'leet translator's searchable, some have varying degrees of 'leetness'

http://www.jayssite.com/stuff/l33t/l33t_translator.html
http://www.robertecker.com/hp/research/leet-converter.php?lang=en


Decker = d3x0r; much like hacker = hax0r or h4x0r
D3<|<3R
|)3(|<3|2


Dex, or d3x is better  
I just have to complain every once in a while; lots of people choose 'd3' as an abbreviation... and that's more like d33Z /\/utZ..  n00b j/k

[MarkE]

OK.  I didn't mean to offend.  I was just being lazy.

[synchro1]

Ever read Dr Dragone's work?

http://tesla3.com/free_websites/zpe_dragone.html


Zaev and Dragone come down to adiabatics. I'll try and simplify it; Magnetization raises the heat capacity in the ferrite. Demagnetization causes a cooling!


Dragone places a magnet inside a coil core wound to deliver equal masking strength. When he energizes the coil, the PM field vanishes. Dr. Dragone begins by asking where did it go? WHERE DID THE PERMANENT MAGNET FIELD GO? Why does the magnet grow cold?


Think about this: We shock the magnet cold. The magnet warms back up by itself.  Total heat gain is more then the  joules of shock power can deliver!

[MarkE]

Ever read Dr Dragone's work?

http://tesla3.com/free_websites/zpe_dragone.html


Zaev and Dragone come down to adiabatics. I'll try and simplify it; Magnetization raises the heat capacity in the ferrite. Demagnetization causes a cooling!


Dragone places a magnet inside a coil core wound to deliver equal masking strength. When he energizes the coil, the PM field vanishes. Dr. Dragone begins by asking where did it go? WHERE DID THE PERMANENT MAGNET FIELD GO? Why does the magnet grow cold?


Think about this: We shock the magnet cold. The magnet warms back up by itself.  Hotter then the shock power can heat!

I don't know what he claims to be a doctor of, but he is way off the mark.  Opposing flux means that the net flux sums to a smaller value.  Neither field has gone anywhere.  There are many similar experiments using bifilar coils.  There are many useful mechanical devices that have capitalized on flux cancellation.  None have yielded any excess energy.  None have destroyed energy.  There are magento-caloric materials out there.  Whether these guys are using them in their experiments or not, there is again no net energy gain or loss in their application.

He goes on to make a series of assertions and then draw conclusions from those untested assertions.  Like many, he takes the solution of the integral for energy in a linear inductor from I = 0 to Ix:  E = 0.5*LIx² and then tries to apply that solution to one where the integral does not start at zero.  Fail to measure the right values, like JLN did, and/or apply the wrong equations and get silly results.  If any of these guys could get excess energy, then you should be asking yourself where their working free energy machines are.

[synchro1]

People also pose that question to Thane Hines who has demonstrated OU in his Bitoroid Transformer. It's impractical to apply the tiny power unts, gains in milliwatts, to running a household appliance.


Experimenters have determined conclusively that there's a non linear relationship between magnetization and demagnetization events. This implies a quantum involvement that involves relativistic analysis to understand.


The permenent magnet material has to do more work to reestablish it's neutralized field then it takes to suppress it.