PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[JouleSeeker]

@jouleseeker


Here's a video that shows non-latching too...  (tape wound core doesn't hold field)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHbQXnXK6Xc


Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsN2sr3U0PY  (has a bit that transfers the 'holding' energy from the secondary back to the primary)
Also shows that the resistive loss in the wire eventually kills the current in the closed-loop secondary ...


And some flux gate switching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HyyGdnmb0

Thanks dx30r! 

Also profitis and synchro1 - I'm catching up as we've been traveling a lot last several weeks.
--Steve

[JouleSeeker]

Independent testing results are now available from a 2014 testing of an E-cat device.

Scientific treatise for download here:  https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/luganoreportsubmit.pdf

    This is what I find so exciting, yet so puzzling!!  From Appendix 3 in the Lugano report (see chart below).

-->  Why is Li-7 consumed, but not Li-6? what is the reaction?  (I presume P+ Li7 reacting - and releasing heat... LENR)

-->  Why are Ni-58 and Ni-60 consumed, but not Ni-62?!!   (Presumably p-Ni58 and p-Ni60 reactions are occurring - and releasing heat.  LENR.)

To perform a replication - but I would use standard WATER CALORIMETRY to measure the output energy -- one needs to know just what is in the test cylinder.  For example, specifically what chemical species of Lithium and nickel, and what else is in there?  Is this a "proprietary secret" at this time?

[profitis]

Posibly some fission plus fusion mix going on in there.from a entropy standpoint I would imagine that the element isotopes that are most vulnerable to disintergration or co-hesion will go first.obviously in tiny amounts

[JouleSeeker]

  Yes, its quite a mystery as to what is going on here.  Presumably proton + nickel => copper, but then one would hope they would look for copper isotopes in the ash and I don't see that they did this.  But I'm still reading the long paper... very interesting.

[MarkE]

Independent testing results are now available from a 2014 testing of an E-cat device.

Scientific treatise for download here:  https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/luganoreportsubmit.pdf

    This is what I find so exciting, yet so puzzling!!  From Appendix 3 in the Lugano report (see chart below).

-->  Why is Li-7 consumed, but not Li-6? what is the reaction?  (I presume P+ Li7 reacting - and releasing heat... LENR)

-->  Why are Ni-58 and Ni-60 consumed, but not Ni-62?!!   (Presumably p-Ni58 and p-Ni60 reactions are occurring - and releasing heat.  LENR.)

To perform a replication - but I would use standard WATER CALORIMETRY to measure the output energy -- one needs to know just what is in the test cylinder.  For example, specifically what chemical species of Lithium and nickel, and what else is in there?  Is this a "proprietary secret" at this time?

Horrifically bad test protocols with inadequate verification often lead to bizarre claims.  Their calculations show radiation scaling with supposed heat flux at a very different rate than convection.  In order to  believe their radiated power one has to believe both that convection efficiency dropped off massively and suddenly in a way that just happened to complement the increase in heat generation and that there was an anomalous jump in heat generation.  It is an embarrassingly silly position for scientists to adopt without evidence.