Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 38 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

Christ.I think I made a mistake when I said 'tiny amounts'.Look at the differences in ratios of measured percents isotopes.am I reading correct?you say this is a faked document mark E?

MarkE

I thought I expressed myself very clearly:  The output power calculations contain major discrepancies that are unaddressed, probably because they were unrecognized, by the authors.  That means that the output power calculations cannot be trusted.  That means that the conclusions drawn from those calculations cannot be trusted.

The authors' claims of transmutation without either high energy or neutron radiation are extraordinary.  As they have demonstrated their willingness to publish unreliable calculations for simple heat output trusting them with assaying isotopes would be very dubious.  Those who can't get simple things right cannot be trusted on more complex issues.

profitis

If that's true then why is the company called elforsk now pressing for intensified lenr research @mark E? You would think that they would be damn sure about what rossi got before such an announcement.according to lewan,rossi got the idea for lithium addition from a japanese researcher who was getting interesting results:  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/04/26/lithium-the-case-for-an-e-cat-catalyst-guest-post-/#comments .I also remember many papers on electrolysis involving excess heat which contained lithium sulfate as electrolyte.

JouleSeeker

Quote from: profitis on October 09, 2014, 07:20:14 PM
...according to lewan,rossi got the idea for lithium addition from a japanese researcher who was getting interesting results:  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/04/26/lithium-the-case-for-an-e-cat-catalyst-guest-post-/#comments .I also remember many papers on electrolysis involving excess heat which contained lithium sulfate as electrolyte.

Very informative, profitis - thanks for the link!

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on October 09, 2014, 07:20:14 PM
If that's true then why is the company called elforsk now pressing for intensified lenr research @mark E? You would think that they would be damn sure about what rossi got before such an announcement.according to lewan,rossi got the idea for lithium addition from a japanese researcher who was getting interesting results:  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/04/26/lithium-the-case-for-an-e-cat-catalyst-guest-post-/#comments .I also remember many papers on electrolysis involving excess heat which contained lithium sulfate as electrolyte.
It is always a bad mistake to try and read tea leaves or other secondary data in place of primary data.  The contradictions in the calculated convection versus radiated heat are fatal to the report.