PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

[nul-points]

 

i would love to see your scr working your transistor.. and please show me what your triggering the scr with at such low volts
[...]

hi Robbie, good to meet you, too, Nick has told us all a lot about you

the SCR-type circuit below will switch on Q3 at i/ps around 0.9-1.2V, select zener or diode on test to adjust pulse switch time-constant. Equivalent load resistance of the full circuit, including LED drive, is several Mohms, so the current draw is well under 1uA

i used it extensively until i found something better

[...]
..probably till i die.. sooner than you think.. 
[...]
robbie

yeah, me too - tho' the Doc has at least managed to get my BP down to exactly half of what it was last year - on both numbers

[JouleSeeker]

 I've been working also on the Bi-toroid transformer (BTT) approach, and in particular, the Gabriel Device.  Big announcement today:

RE:
It look like I have some good news...
Test was with amplifier, at 24 Volts input.
Observation:
1) It seems the output power depend directly of the input current...
2) The secondary current seems to be constant at all load...
3) The best result was when I don't saturate the inner, (inner was at more or less 1 Tesla)...
4) Two test was made: one with 100 Hz and another with 250 Hz...
5) At 100 Hz the output the bulb more brighter than input bulb.
6) At 250 Hz the input bulb was off but the output was gloomy.
7) If I up frequency the output become darker.
8 ) It seems to have an asymmetric, unproportional current between input and output...
9) Traditional transformer windings ratio doesn't work here, 12V 100 turns will not turns into 24V 200 turns for example !!!

Hypothesis:

1) I think is better to not saturate the inner.
2) To increase output with no input, I think to wind more turns at secondary OR
3) The FE effect is not related to Heins effect but rather a phase difference between primary and secondary, more the shell is thick more you have phase difference, at 90° you can put any load you want the input will remain zero..
4) OR both phenomena described above...

Now Photos !!!

Congratulations!  I stand behind you.  WAY behind you in this Xformer development (but see photo of my electronics bench this morning -- at least I'm working on it, climbing the learning curve).

Mavendex says it's a "winner", and I think he's right... but needs QUANTITATIVE measurements ASAP.

QUESTION:  what do you fellows think is the BEST way to make quantitative measurements of Power-in and Power-Out, for this device?

[jbignes5]

Thanks for your comment, Nils (EGP) -- glad we're on the same page on this.

Will do, Jbignes5...  I'm a bit behind in responses and even reading.  Fascinating research overall!

Kooler -- thanks for this reference:

http://www.cwsbytemark.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=206_247

Thats ok I understand how daunting being a professor and researching can be. Like I said it is still in work form so it might be a little hard to follow. As a side note others have also been coming to this conclusion and they are also professors as well. I think the best way to approach this is to understand how energy transfers in the first place. Our current theory has way to many holes in it to be correct and I believe we have gotten it wrong based on something we invented to shore up our current theories and not based on what is present in front of our eyes.
Thanks for responding.
Jbignes5

[JouleSeeker]

NP -- glad to hear this!!

yeah, me too - tho' the Doc has at least managed to get my BP down to exactly half of what it was last year - on both numbers

   I'm trying to get more exercise lately...  but alt-energy is such fun (!) that time is a bit of a factor   

   I finally made it to a small lab at the university and borrowed a Hall-probe to take magnetic-field measurements on two winding types, that we've discussed (above):

1.  Single-wound, 30 turns
2.  Bifilar-wound, total of 30 turns also.

So both have N = 30 turns and should (theoretically) have the same fields... now to compare the field strengths. 
(The Hall probe gives me relative measurements in mV, stronger field shown by higher readings; not calibrated yet... )

Photo shows the set-up.  Data coming.  (I'm finding the 500 kB limit on photo to be time-consuming to do...)

[JouleSeeker]

These photos show results on the ambient B-field, earth's field, with Hall-probe approx. parallel to the meter.  Note that the nail without windings is the same as the probe held approx 10 cm above the nails+windings -- at 1.0 mV in each case. 

This is the ambient reading.

Looking at the photo left, you can see the single-wound coil on a nail, and a bifilar coil is also seen.  These are what we will compare -- as to the B-fields produced.  Notice that the current is sent through BOTH coils at the SAME time; that is, they are connected in series.  This insures that both coils have the exact same DC current.
StevenEJones