Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

albertouno

JouleSeeker:

Hi again after being absent for a while.  I tested your "reduced" no resistor circuit with supercapacitors on the input and output to see what gain was possible.  I used a 2.57 Vdc charge on 10 farads at the input to drive the circuit.  The load was another 10 farad supercap starting at 0 Vdc.  I let it run for 2 hours measuring the voltages on each every 30 minutes.  The energy gain averaged only about 10% over this period.  The input current, and output voltage waveforms were sawtooth in nature. The pulse period decreased from 7.6 us at the start to about 4 us after 2 hrs.  I measured a constand DC current at the input of 3.5ma at the start.  This seems a long way from overunity, and not sure what is wrong.  I have not been able to achieve a Gain greater than 1.0 with any combination of coils or components on this circuit so far.  Help!!  Is your torroid coil using a special material?

best wishes.
albertouno




albertouno

JouleSeeker:

During the past two weeks I have been investigating a Canadian Patent Application that claims to get  overunity (20 to 1?) for real power output vs input using a clever transformer design.  Of course, the device uses AC and not DC, but is scalable to  larger powers.  The application# is 2-594-905 dated 7/18/2007, and can be easily downloaded on the official Canadian patent web site.  The measurement data included with the application was verified by a qualified person (PHD Chief Engineer for a Canadian power company).  I have my own thoughts on what is happening with this device, but thought you might be interested in what is being claimed.  He has apparentl discussed the theory at MIT also.  Interesting device, but is it really creating new energy in violation with the known laws of physics, or just transforming reactive power to real power?

Albertouno

jbignes5

Quote from: albertouno on October 07, 2011, 07:53:07 PM
JouleSeeker:

During the past two weeks I have been investigating a Canadian Patent Application that claims to get  overunity (20 to 1?) for real power output vs input using a clever transformer design.  Of course, the device uses AC and not DC, but is scalable to  larger powers.  The application# is 2-594-905 dated 7/18/2007, and can be easily downloaded on the official Canadian patent web site.  The measurement data included with the application was verified by a qualified person (PHD Chief Engineer for a Canadian power company).  I have my own thoughts on what is happening with this device, but thought you might be interested in what is being claimed.  He has apparentl discussed the theory at MIT also.  Interesting device, but is it really creating new energy in violation with the known laws of physics, or just transforming reactive power to real power?

Albertouno

Thats Thane Hines setup. a very interesting one to boot. Much can be learned by his process if we chose to look at it.

nul-points

Quote from: albertouno on October 07, 2011, 07:53:07 PM
[...]
application# is 2-594-905 dated 7/18/2007, and can be easily downloaded on the official Canadian patent web site
[...]
Albertouno

hi Albertouno

that's Thane's BiTT device which Prof Jones has mentioned earlier in this thread (it also has a sizeable thread of it's own on this Forum)

HTH

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

gyulasun

Quote from: albertouno on October 07, 2011, 07:53:07 PM
JouleSeeker:

During the past two weeks I have been investigating a Canadian Patent Application that claims to get  overunity (20 to 1?) for real power output vs input using a clever transformer design.  Of course, the device uses AC and not DC, but is scalable to  larger powers.  The application# is 2-594-905 dated 7/18/2007, and can be easily downloaded on the official Canadian patent web site.  The measurement data included with the application was verified by a qualified person (PHD Chief Engineer for a Canadian power company).  I have my own thoughts on what is happening with this device, but thought you might be interested in what is being claimed.  He has apparentl discussed the theory at MIT also.  Interesting device, but is it really creating new energy in violation with the known laws of physics, or just transforming reactive power to real power?

Albertouno

Hi Alberto,

I would be interested to learn about your views on what is happening with this device. Would you be so kind to share your opinion.

Thanks, Gyula