A Test to Prove Gravity Has Mass

[sm0ky2]

the moon is revolving around the earth as it should, in a million years the same face of the moon will not be the same. it revolves its face very slowly.
you must read on why it is.

examine non-polarized moons of other planets, they rotate on their axis, much like the earth does.

the tides among the great lakes ...

The great lakes dont have tides

no, it has been proven that gravity is a pulling force and or an attractive force ...

how so??  the experiments generally attributed to this assumption are no more "proof" one way or the other, than the pico-graviton experiment at the begining of this thread....

"attractive" force, i'll give you that,. but wether it pulls from the masses, or pushes towards them, is still up for debate. ( in my opinion)

[onthecuttingedge2010]

examine non-polarized moons of other planets, they rotate on their axis, much like the earth does.

do you realize , the earth's moon is the only one that is leaving its own planet?

The great lakes dont have tides

all things are effected by gravity even in the least.

how so??  the experiments generally attributed to this assumption are no more "proof" one way or the other, than the pico-graviton experiment at the begining of this thread....

this theory of yours is nothing but crap, no math or observation to prove it self. amongst current theory which has more data than you.

"attractive" force, i'll give you that,. but wether it pulls from the masses, or pushes towards them, is still up for debate. ( in my opinion)

if you chose pull then you are correct if not then you are a rebellion against truth. period.

jerry

[sm0ky2]

this theory of yours is nothing but crap, no math or observation to prove it self. amongst current theory which has more data than you.

if you chose pull then you are correct if not then you are a rebellion against truth. period.

jerry

i havent stated anything about a theory of my own.

the truth of the matter is, that currently accepted theories of gravity, proposed gravitational theories, and even those accepted in the past, only prove the mass-dependent relationship of the forces involved.
Some theories propose that the forces do not "push" OR "pull", but rather that space-time curvature causes them to move together.


They do not definitively prove the source or origin of the forces.
I'm not saying that they are wrong or right, just that it has not been proven. Which is why they are still considered "theories".

Even the laws of Newton himself, do not prove wether the forces "push", "pull", or a combination of both.

[brian334]

The issue is weather or not the proposed test will prove anything.

[AB Hammer]

The issue is weather or not the proposed test will prove anything.

Brian334

I believe you already Know the answer due to how this thread has gone. There are issues that need to be solved before we will be even able to truly understand your test.

_______

Here is my new theory. Planetary magnetism and gravity are two different things. Being similar in manner, seems to make them hard to distinguish. This is why gravity is hard to understand.
Alan Bauldree's Theory copy rite, this day 6-03-2011