Simulation of the Muller Dynamo

[poynt99]

.99, I have seen (I think) where you can make C1 and C2 variable caps in a sim, either that or sweep the frequency?

Dunno, you're the doctor

Ron

Just to further my comment above, I'm questioning this because a frequency sweep of this patent circuit from 15Hz to 100kHz yields nothing but a 1:1 high-pass response on the output.

.99

[i_ron]

Ron,

I'm now looking at this thing and wondering "what is the big deal?". What I see is no matter which operating mode (generator or transformer), after a certain high frequency (determined by X_C), aren't the two windings just simply in parallel?

It doesn't make sense to me. What am I missing?

.99

Yes, without more information as to what the guy figured was happening it is just another head scratcher... thanks for confirming what I suspected

Ron

[poynt99]

Well, in case there is something to this patent and we've missed it, I have translated it and saved it as a pdf, along with the original patent and better patent drawings.

He claims the coil pair is non-inductive.

.99

[i_ron]

Well, in case there is something to this patent and we've missed it, I have translated it and saved it as a pdf, along with the original patent and better patent drawings.

He claims the coil pair is non-inductive.

.99

Thanks, excellent translation makes for a fascinating read!  It would seem then that a better thought out experiment would show some advantages?

Exactly what is implied, non-inductive is anti Lenz?

Ron

[poynt99]

Thanks, excellent translation makes for a fascinating read!  It would seem then that a better thought out experiment would show some advantages?

Exactly what is implied, non-inductive is anti Lenz?

Ron

I haven't poured over the entire patent yet, only a few bits. I'll have to print it out and read it before bed (hopefully it won't put me to sleep).

.99