Argentinean Magnet Motor selfrunning with helper coils

[NerzhDishual]

@Low-Q (the 'misnamed', IMHO).

I beg to differ (I do like this expression  ) about Mainstream Science.
To me: Mainstream Science sucks despite some equations.

Anyway, It will cost me too much (not free!) NRG to argue.

Meanwhile, I do not diverge about your views upon NRG.

I was just expressing a strong 'belief', indeed, but a mere belief'.
Please 'believe' me, it is not so easy to discuss, debate, argue in another language
that you native one, especially when you have learnt it from 'outside'. .

But perhaps, English is not your native language also?
In that case : "chapeau!". You got it right.

My aim, here, is not to confront with anybody, but, on the contrary, to befriend
with some individual and to, as far as I'm able to, give some information.

Very Best

[z.monkey]

but I still not have found anything 'OU'. 

Concerning overunity, I let loose a spiel here...
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6944.msg292305#msg292305

[guruji]

This looks like a Perendev motor. Those coils for generating electricity to those leds.

[NerzhDishual]

@Z-Monkey

Thanks a lot for your link. OU dot com is so huge.
I have not still read the whole thread.

I was not accurate when I said "but I still not have found anything 'OU'".

I actually meant : I have not achieved *myself* any experiment that
shows any (so called) "OU".

Or? Did you get me right and were the 2 letters 'OU' that repulsed you?

You preach to the choir... "OU" is misnamed and Free NRG can be
very expensive, especially when sold by some con artists...

Anyway, I use "OU" because, to me, "OU" means:
No more fossil fuel.
No more "Fuck U Shima Die Itchy".
No More PWB/(W?) Kontrol.
Yes, I'm dreaming...

I'm under the impression that achieving "OU" (being able to catch
NRG from some still not officially recognized 'outside' source) is (still)
a matter of Mojo/Magic (like dowsing) and that only some individuals are gifted with.

I sounds like that the "OU paradigm" is not enough "engraved" in the so called
"collective conscientiousness".  Rupert Sheldrake?

Anyway, I can feel that the 2011 year should be a beginning.

Very best

[The Eskimo Quinn]

P.S: The inventor wrote on his channel:

He wrote about this video:

In this opportunity i would like to show you a completely magnetic motor. This kind of motor DOES NOT need to be supply by any kind of battery, or electrical net or solar energy, because it uses his own alimentation by spinning. And, at the same time, can generates extra electric current (as we can see, the led lights connected to the motor are on).

The principle is easy to understand. All the motors have one rotor and one stator, but in this motor, we have three neodymium discs (instead of a rotor) and two neodymium rings (instead of a stator) and one last neodymium ring that functions as a magnetic oscillator, self-excited by a stage of captors. This captors commutes the magnet's polarities.

This very same principle its now being use in our last prototype: 1 HP (600 W free). We will upload as soon as possible an explication video for the HP.

The prototype that you seeing in this video provides 50 W free (12V CC - 4 Amp).
===========

Regards, STefan.

my issue is (and you all undertsand my brain is a logic computer nothing more) is that the disks as shown numbers 2 and 3 do nothing, the proof is simple, if these two disks can trun the machine from the alignment of the disks, then they can do it without the first disk, if thgey cannot, then they do not contribute to the macine. There is no connection other than the sahft, so there is no input from the rest of the machine, thus they help by self truning or do not help.  I end this with simply saying that i do not question oif the machine works or not, it it too complex without any specs (as usual) so to me if it runs, only the front disk does this, again if the two rear disks trun the machine then they can do it without the front section, if not the front section is carrying the last two disks. That is my logic view, use it or dont.