Eddy currents and their implications

[ramset]

Dave
"it can be done"?

I like the sound of that ! Has this been done ?any research or data to indicate the possibility?

Thanks
Chet

[Dave45]

research - yes
data - not yet

[frankly]

I like Newmans analogy of the magnetic field in that there are spinning particles exiting the magnet, only Newman says there is only one domain, that I dont agree with, there are definitely two moving in opposite directions, thats why when passing a magnet in front of a coil you get ac current no matter which pole is facing the coil.

That being said if you pass a magnet past a wire, when the n field crosses the wire you get current in one direction but as the magnet rolls over and the s passes the same wire you get current in the other direction, if you take two springs wound in opposite directions and bring to bear on a wire you can see how this works, a very simple test but very effective.

All we are doing in any gernerator is using the wires to collect the field, I think there can be overunity there, but it is a very very balanced situation.

We need to find a better way and that way is to trap the field, as the field moves through a medium when the field is turned off the medium needs to keep the field from dissolving and focus it onto an electrode to be collected, the only thing that can accomplish this that I know of is a crystal configuration-structure.

We need to leave the old paradigm and find another way.
David

Hi David. Good to see you here.

There are a few points I would like to raise with your statements though. Firstly, the dipolar domain. For solid form to exist as seperate from the aether, it must be equally charged. North and South, together in an infinite dance. This does not mean it is two domains, it is simply that, if it were possible to pick up the torroid of charge and examine it, it would appear to spin clockwise at the top, and anticlockwise at the bottom. When looking from the top, the spinning charge appears to enter the center of the torroid from the left, and leave from the right as the whole thing spins, and vice verce for the bottom, with a blurred Bloch wall at the center and at the hemispehere of the two charges, where the vortex links to the rest of the universe.  This flux path from the center leaves the torroid from the top and bottom, pushed out by the "strong nuclear force" and comes in at the sides, the "weak nuclear force". Read Nassim Harramein's stuff for referance, and Marco Rodin.

The key to unlocking this process lies with orientation.

Now, as to moving a magnet pole past a wire. The action of a single pole's flux path interaction with a wire does not form AC, your next statement, of North and South, does. However, not seperately.

One pole forms one charge in the wire as it approaches, by virtue of it having it's flux axis rotation fixed in space, and a space of charge to fill. As the magnet moves away, this charge is inverted by the opposing flux path direction, which fills the hole. This may be called AC, but is not alternating in polarity, for it is the same pole of the magnet delivering both charges. Rectifying this does not deliver the energy needed.

AC is formed by the approach of both poles together upon either side of the wire. Forming negative potential, or an area of positive charge. These pole peices are then moved away, leaving an area of charge by putting a diode in the way, and delivering amperage by connecting the other end of the wire to the load, and leaving in the pole pieces, an attraction force known as Lenz's law. This ensures any Eddy Current which forms remains locked in the stator. Control of this current is achieved with a power regulator.

Rectifying this does not deliver the energy needed either, as the load cannot "see" the Eddy Current.

(Tesla called this Eddy the "fundamental frequency" and found that the primary coil could not hold a current which spun faster than this primary one).

Anyway, I think that I have probably said enough for a start, I will leave it up to everyone here to go test the statements I have made if they wish, and form their own conclusions, and deliver feedback rather than making statements which do not appear to be based upon experimental results. No offense intended David. It is just that what you have repeated seems to be text book theory, and is not what is to be found in the real world, as simple experiments will show.

I am ready to help with experiments and testing procedures if needed.

Just ask.

But I would like to see that people are thinking before i keep going, otherwise the further statements I make will be lost in dis-belief.

Frankly.

[Dave45]

Hi David. Good to see you here.

Thanks glad to be here,

There are a few points I would like to raise with your statements though. Firstly, the dipolar domain. For solid form to exist as seperate from the aether, it must be equally charged. North and South, together in an infinite dance. This does not mean it is two domains, it is simply that, if it were possible to pick up the torroid of charge and examine it, it would appear to spin clockwise at the top, and anticlockwise at the bottom. When looking from the top, the spinning charge appears to enter the center of the torroid from the left, and leave from the right as the whole thing spins, and vice verce for the bottom, with a blurred Bloch wall at the center and at the hemispehere of the two charges, where the vortex links to the rest of the universe.  This flux path from the center leaves the torroid from the top and bottom, pushed out by the "strong nuclear force" and comes in at the sides, the "weak nuclear force". Read Nassim Harramein's stuff for referance, and Marco Rodin.

The key to unlocking this process lies with orientation.

Im sure you'v thought this through, but in my studies Iv found that if you take a spring that is wound to the right no matter the orientation it will appear to spin to the right and the same with a spring wound to the left, it can be deceiving if you dont have both in front of you to study.
It also appears in nature, quartz crystalls have both but the one's harvested are always, well in most cases a right hand twist.

Now, as to moving a magnet pole past a wire. The action of a single pole's flux path interaction with a wire does not form AC, your next statement, of North and South, does. However, not seperately.

I agree not seperatly for in a magnet you have two poles a both ends one moving into the magnet face and one moving away, Im sorry but I dont subscribe to the bloch wall theory that would imply that the pole of the electron or particle whatever we want to call it flips poles half way through the magnet I just dont see that happening.

So what is the bloch wall it has been observed, I think it is a counter rotation that happens in the middle of the magnet close to the magnet where the fields are weaker.

One pole forms one charge in the wire as it approaches, by virtue of it having it's flux axis rotation fixed in space, and a space of charge to fill. As the magnet moves away, this charge is inverted by the opposing flux path direction, which fills the hole. This may be called AC, but is not alternating in polarity, for it is the same pole of the magnet delivering both charges. Rectifying this does not deliver the energy needed.

AC is formed by the approach of both poles together upon either side of the wire. Forming negative potential, or an area of positive charge. These pole peices are then moved away, leaving an area of charge by putting a diode in the way, and delivering amperage by connecting the other end of the wire to the load, and leaving in the pole pieces, an attraction force known as Lenz's law. This ensures any Eddy Current which forms remains locked in the stator. Control of this current is achieved with a power regulator.

Rectifying this does not deliver the energy needed either, as the load cannot "see" the Eddy Current.

So what does rectifying a current do well we are running a ac charge through a crystal that allows only the right hand twist to move through we cut our voltage and current in half.
Leedskalnin said we only use one pole and he's correct by rectifying a circuit we loose one pole.
I dont think rectifying an ac charge creates true dc as the dc in a battery.

(Tesla called this Eddy the "fundamental frequency" and found that the primary coil could not hold a current which spun faster than this primary one).

Anyway, I think that I have probably said enough for a start, I will leave it up to everyone here to go test the statements I have made if they wish, and form their own conclusions, and deliver feedback rather than making statements which do not appear to be based upon experimental results. No offense intended David. It is just that what you have repeated seems to be text book theory, and is not what is to be found in the real world, as simple experiments will show.

No offense taken, but I said I had no data that I care to release but that doesnt mean that I havent been experimenting.

Also another observation I would like to bring to your attention is the statement by science that the electric field runs ninety degrees to the magnetic field, this is simply not true, and here's an experiment that will show you whats happening if you put a ball on the end of a string walking forward to emulate the spin and direction and release the ball it will move away ninety degrees to the direction of travel, that gives the impression that the electric field is ninety degrees to the mag field but it isnt.

I am ready to help with experiments and testing procedures if needed.

Just ask.

But I would like to see that people are thinking before i keep going, otherwise the further statements I make will be lost in dis-belief.

Frankly.

I think together we can dispel the miths and find the answer the world needs.
David

[BobTEW]

BobTEW
New_User

Posts: 13

Re: Ground breaking work of Frank Znidarsic (Cold Fusion & Anti-gravity explained)
« Reply #79 on: February 03, 2011, 04:08:18 PM »QuoteThe magnet-iron oxide here is the total picture cut in half;the wild clown. White eyes are the photon pulse; white light energy. Blue color is the cold figure eight FLOW of the "electrons"; the repel-push of the magnet. The red ruby and nose is one of the center dark energy GRAVITY rings {there is three of them}. The yellow plates at the corner of eyes are same seen on Saturn's North Pole; ah the power of spin! The flair out at the ears is the Aurora's. The last remaining yellow hot resistive lines is the attaction part of the magnet.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------