Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

DeepCut

Hi all, so we're all on crack and drugs and drink ?

I'm having a cup of tea and a ciggy, but i'm boring like that ;+}

@Luc and Keyho, Romero's circuit is the same as the standard SSG driving circuit but with a Hall sensor rather than a coil.

@ Thane,

thanks for advising me not to connect them serially !

Results of multi-coil tests :

No coils present.

hz : 502

ma : 452

1 coil present open circuit.

hz : 417
ma : 472

1 coil present short circuit.

hz : 505
ma : 445

2 coils present, both open circuit.

hz : 393
ma : 475

2 coils present, both short circuited.

hz : 514
ma : 438

3 coils present, open circuit.

hz : 388
ma : 474

3 coils present, all SC

hz : 511
ma : 440


I think i understand why two coils outperformed three with my setup.

Because it is a single-magnet rotor, the two coils on opposite sides of the magnet are synchronised in the sense that they both experience the flux change at the same time, whereas the third coil, which is in the middle of the other two, experiences flux-change after the first coil and before the second of the other two coils, so the timing is wrong and possibly fights against the effect from the other two.

I confirmed this by moving the third coil closer to one of the others and performance goes up.

Obviously the single-magnet design has it's limitations, the physical space required for many coils isn't available and the timing problem.

I'll be making a multi-magnet rotor now but in the meantime i'll experiment with getting power out of this device, time to order some high-current wire ;+}


All the best,

DC.





matthewklinko

Quote from: kEhYo77 on November 01, 2011, 11:56:01 AM
Let There Be Light! 660W light out -700W back to the grid (European 230/50) :D
... I just have to try that! Thanks CRANKYpants

Using that circuit simulator, you are graphing power consumed.

The source does not consume power , it generates power hence the negative power.

There is no overunity it that.

If you don't believe me, do your own calcs, graph the voltage ad current and multiply them, and you will get positive power.

DeepCut

Can anyone recommend a good circuit simulator ?


Cheers,

DC.

Magluvin

Hey Deep

Falstad.com has Circuit, as shown in posts above  ^   =]

Its very decent for free.

Poynt uses Spice, he may be able to help you with that.       
I havnt used it yet.

Mags

SchubertReijiMaigo

The negative power in sims is not OU: It's a manner to display the power draw from source, if you have for example -10 watts peak, its' meaning you REMOVE 10 watts peak from source and not you inject it !!! It's a beginner error that I've learned few day ago when experimenting. I'm skeptic to extract resonance directly like this without High Q and Transverter diode plug clipping circuit (extracting without killing the resonance...)