Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[RAD-HHO]

Thanks Rick for doing this Spice Simulation of the circuit. Great job and idea of making a video of it.

I re-uploaded my video since I now feel confident with everyone's support that this was not an error in my part.
I added a link to NoMorePetro (Rick) Simulation in the YouTube video description.

Thanks again for everyone's support.

Link to re-uploaded video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuBAN9uf7Uo

Luc

Luc, Your quite welcome, Thank you for all your work!

Overunityguide, I have attached the Spice shots you requested on youtube. I added a voltage divider to the input to bring down the input voltage so it would show the output voltage better on the Spice scope shot.  The input voltage is now divided by ten.  The circuit resistance did not change though.

Rick

[gotoluc]

Hello Gotoluc I have DSO 2090, just a tips to measure the power, use the maths function (CannelA*ChannelB) to display power, if you see a curve that have equal pulse above and bottom the zero line you have reactive power, maybe it will be much easier to read.

Channel -> Maths -> Activate -> SourceA(Channel1) -> SourceB(Channel2) ->
Operation -> A*B...

Hi SchubertReijiMaigo,

sorry I forgot to reply to your post.

I've noticed the Math function before and did play around with it but don't quite understand it yet.

Thanks for your post

Luc

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

Thanks you, I have read this thread by hazard, it seems your delayed Lenz law device device, look like Transverter device (Rotoverter sold state version) . If you read Combine.pdf you find a lot of information: especially they said in semi resonance state (like your case) L become R R become C and C become L resulting a PF of 0 in series or PF = 1 in parallel with minimum watts consumption (the real watts at secondary is not reflected to the source)... Another thing is they said for every real watts you need to circulate 10 VAR and PF 0 in order to achieve OU state, the energy is in Radio Frequency state Voltage at node/ Current at anti node... It's very look a like for me.

The PF 89 ° that Thane has calculated is due maybe to the 1 ohm load which reflect to the line as PF=1 try to measure voltage across the coil and capacitor excluding the shunt to see what happen, if you find PF=0 Bingo !!!

Your experiment start to interest me a lot, look like that someone have put in real in real world the Transverter device with of the off the shelf device !!!

Good Job and Good luck.

[CRANKYpants]

Luc, Your quite welcome, Thank you for all your work!
Rick

NICE WORK RICK,

NOW PLEASE PUT THE SCOPE ACROSS THE TRANSFORMER PRIMARY AND REDO THE SIMULATION.

THANKS
T

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

I have made LT Spice simulation, with same value and parameter, the power of the secondary load is reflected to the source exactly, look like simulation is not best way to test this configuration. Simulation usually comply with law of conservation energy and are not always in accordance with reality...

What happen if you load more the trafo, maybe must be retuning the cap value to keep PF=0 with different load...

Your trafo is 12 volts with 10 Ohms load which dissipate 14 watts of real power, right ?

According to the classical law of conservation your meter should display 14 watts also... But instead display 0 watts... So I don't think your meter is fooled because your are in the 15 watts range...