Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Started by Overunityguide, August 30, 2011, 04:59:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

@MileHigh: thank you for taking the time to explain my measurements and tests. This is what I always hope for in this forum, a discussion of specific set ups and circuits.

Greetings, Conrad

gyulasun

Hi Conrad,

I think that controlling the Hall sensor by the ring magnet may not give you as much flexibility in adjusting the length of the ON time for the switch as you would receive from a separate, smaller sized magnets on a separate disk.
With the ring magnet the Hall device can sense the same flux strength during very nearly 180° of a full 360° rotational cycle, as is shown by the 50% duty cycle of the switching pulses. I think this is why you found that you could not compansate for the "loss of the spikes", whereever you position the Hall sensor within a hemisphere volume the flux strength is more or less the same during a 180°rotational cycle.

Keep up the great work.

rgds,  Gyula

synchro1

Synchro:

When you are talking about pulse motor circuits and bifilar coils you have to be specific. Just making general comments won't work. I am assuming that when you say "bifilar coil" you are talking about two separate coils wound around the same bobbin. I am also assuming that they will not be made to work in self-cancellation mode because that makes no sense. So you have four terminals for the two separate wires that make up the bifilar coil. How do you connect each one of those four terminals into a pulse motor circuit? Can you draw a schematic because that's 1000 times better than a verbal description.

You state:

  Quote
I don't think his bifilar needs any extra help to run a N S array. I don't think Bedini discovered that, I believe it had to be shown to him. The bifilar is ambivilant about a pole face. The approaching "Magnet Pole" causes an opposite pole to appear in the bifilar. This pole is reinforced by the power pulse.
 
I have no idea what means because I don't even know how you wire a bifilar coil into a pulse motor. If you want to clarify your statements and show a schematic and even add a timing diagram, even if it is a hand-drawn sketch, then people will have a much better chance of understanding you.

MileHigh

This picture is exactly what I'm talking about: Note the 4 wires 2 ends. Look below it, you'll see a red wire Tesla bifilar wraped on a  thread spool, in series with a 12 volt reed switch. That's a "Mach Speed" circuit. I would post a schematic for it, but all it takes to spin a diametric tube is a battery between one end of the bifilar coil and one end of the reed switch. The other end of the bifilar coil attaches to the loose end of the reed switch. The power pulse passes directly through the reed switch. Three componants comprise this simpelist circuit. I can't explain why it seemingly begins to power itself over 25k.

hanon

Skycollection has posted a video (Confirming the delayed Lenz Effect) with a message for replicators

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP-k-AW-ejM

Message:  A MESSAGE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO ARE BUILDING PANCAKE COILS, "NOT CONFUSE" ...! THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BI-FILAR PANCAKE COIL IS EASY BUT "IT DOESN´T MEAN THAT YOU ARE GOING TO DELAY THE LENZ EFFECT", THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE YOU WILL LOSE TIME AND MONEY. MY PTOTOTYPES OF PANCAKE COIL HAS INSIDE OF THE COIL A COMPONENT THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO DELAY THE LENZ EFFECT, FOR THAT REASON NOT HAVE BEEN REPLICATED.

According to the speech in the video he is going to explain it step by step in the future

synchro1

I believe the series reed switch circuit accelerates the spinner and slips "Lenz effect". The setup achieves unity beyound threshold speed just like the twin self looped zero draw spirals. Bearingless spinners reduce friction loss to a minimum. I believe a Neo Sphere spinner inside a bifilar "Spiral Knot", pulsed by a reed switch in series with a battery, would demonstrate the zero amp draw "Lenz Delay Unity" threshold r.p.m with an amp meter and Laser tach.

We don't need a seperate self looped output coil to achieve "Unity" from "Lenz Cleansing". One levitating bearingless spinner inside a spifilar air core will balance the exchange after reaching "Glide Speed" just shorted to a battery throgh a reed switch!