Fun Capacitor Circuit

[hartiberlin]

but you claim you get more energy alltogether in all caps.. so do you put then all 3 or 4 caps in series or what ? I am now totally confused and don?t know what you are doing exactly... please describe again in detail how you get the motor to run longer compared to the standard 12 volts single cap. Thanks.

[pg46]

Hi All-

Sorry for the delayed responses, as like I said before I haven't steady access to internet just now since I am currently travelling.
hartiberlin-
If we put the energy formulas aside for the moment.
  Let me say here first that it is far easier to actually do the circuit than to write about it  Let's run through it again here anyhow-
1)Take 3 identical caps 2) lets call them C1,C2 and C3   3)charge C1 to 12 volts 4)connect C1 neg to C2 neg 5) connect C2 pos to C3 neg 6) finally connect C3 pos back over to C1 pos
You will end up with approx. 8 volts in C1 and 4 volts in each C2 and C3  - thats it !

Best,

[FreeEnergy]

there is a saying - energy cannot be destroyed or created, it can only change form - somewhere in quantum physics

[NerzhDishual]

Hi pg46 

Is that what you really mean?
Sounds not 'conventional'.
Anyway, I will try it.

Best

[NerzhDishual]

Hi everybody and especially pg48

Should I be understood when craming my own stuff into this one: a quote from pg48 

See, if we take a single 12 volt cap and connect in parallel with 2 others the same we end up with 3 seperate caps charged to 4 volts each. Even though these are 12 volts combined, according to the energy formula these three combined don't add up to the original 12 volt charge (3 x 0.176=0.528) The original 12 volt cap has 1.584 joules.

That is exactly what I was saying in another post. When you parallel-connect 2 or more caps, it appears that you are loosing NRG, as pg46 is pointing out with his 3 caps (1.584 joules vs 0.528 joules).

Should I be allowed to 'self-quote' my May 16, 2006 post to "free energy circuit setup"? (It was about 2 caps and the "lost NRG".)

Not at all, said my physics textbook!
The reasoning is (sorry for my translation, but the French text is not so limpid):There have been production of another energy that the electric charging energy of the second cap. The wires between the two cap have been travelled by an electric current which have produced in these wires a calorific energy w''. This calorificNRG does not depends upon the resistance of the wires and represents the difference w-w'' wich equals W/2.

Ok scientists...
So, when I put a motor betwen the two caps, I guess that the calorific NRG should vanish as I have the same results (V/2 for each cap) plus a motor running. [...]
Sorry, but I can not help smelling a rat.

That is what I was saying a couple of weeks ago.
I can say that again.

The caps's behavior seems to be strange.
But, the  experimenter creativity is infinite.

Best