another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Magluvin]

Hey Rose

Its the post before that one you will like.



Night Rose
Mags

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hey Rose

Its the post before that one you will like.



Night Rose
Mags

LOL  I'll check it out.  Take care there and sleep well,

Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Poynty Point,

I thought I made this clear.  I am NOT proposing to do these tests to convince you or even the readers here - that we've achieved COP infinity.  As desirable as that may be - my objects are far more comprehensive.  And they're NOT negotiable.  The overriding intention is PRECISELY to engage our academics for a variety of reasons.  One is that it would be a way of bringing this proof of over unity to the attention of our boffins.  Another is that I would be entirely satisfied that they'd be impartial and intellectually honest. Another is that their engagement will - hopefully - encourage their own independent research into the reasons for this 'effect'.  Another is that IF there is a basis of validity in the results - that we may have a desirable technology to progress.  Which, with due respect to the copious talents available on these forums - is still not likely to be as exemplary and as thorough as their own work in this regard.  They have the skill sets, the test equipment and the authority of mainstream.  That's where this progress is required.

Then.  I am ONLY testing the claims that are detailed in our papers.  Anything extraneous to that will not re-inforce the evidence that those papers refer to.  And those papers are the record of some very hard work that has been applied here.  Not only that - but the proposed test is considerably more definitive than the test you proposed.  This because you are making the assumption that if the one light is stronger than the other light - then it is, correspondingly, being powered by the supply.  Which diametrically opposes - not only our evidence - but the thesis in support of this evidence.  I am rather concerned that you KNOW this and yet you are proposing to IGNORE this.  I am on record.  We KNOW that the one rail stays lit while the other does not light at all.  Are you trying to 'skew' the test here Poynty?  I'll deal with this in a follow up post.  The argument needs more space than I care to give here.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[poynt99]

Rosemary,

I proposed this test because you seem open to a method other than used in your paper, i.e. the battery drawdown test. This is what you have already proposed we do to settle the debate.

I am simply proposing a method that is much easier and quicker, and won't cost a bundle of money or people's time such as the battery drawdown tests will.

I don't understand technically, what your objection is to it. Technically, this method is sound. I invite any and all readers to comment on this method, good or bad. Presented to any academic, this method would also satisfy their requirement for scientific rigor and exactitude.

The only thing I can not guarantee beforehand, is if it will affect your COP infinity measurement. I don't believe it will, but you would need to try it first of course. I will try it in my simulation and post the results.

Anyway, I am trying to help out here, not make things more difficult. I am most certainly not trying to trick anyone, and that's part of the reason I propose this be done open source. Any "foul play" can be weeded out immediately.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

I proposed this test because you seem open to a method other than used in your paper, i.e. the battery drawdown test. This is what you have already proposed we do to settle the debate.

I am simply proposing a method that is much easier and quicker, and won't cost a bundle of money or people's time such as the battery drawdown tests will.

I don't understand technically, what your objection is to it. Technically, this method is sound. I invite any and all readers to comment on this method, good or bad. Presented to any academic, this method would also satisfy their requirement for scientific rigor and exactitude.

The only thing I can not guarantee beforehand, is if it will affect your COP infinity measurement. I don't believe it will, but you would need to try it first of course. I will try it in my simulation and post the results.

Anyway, I am trying to help out here, not make things more difficult. I am most certainly not trying to trick anyone, and that's part of the reason I propose this be done open source. Any "foul play" can be weeded out immediately.

Poynty - I'll try and get back here later tonight.  I'm bushed.  I'll explain the problem.  But I've actually already tried to point it out.  Just read back on that oscillation and how it effects a dual rail of diodes.  Did you even read it?  Anyway.  I am so tired I can hardly type.  I'll try and get back here later.

Regards,
R