another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

"Na TK  dont switch this on Rose."

Wait a minute.... aren't YOU trying to "switch this" on ME? Who started discussion about the WhipMag?

You are implying that my present work is flawed, not because of anything in the present work itself, except for the strawman I have gutted, but rather by citing some other work, years ago, that you didn't quite understand, and that you attribute to me. Isn't that a classic argumentum ad hominem, abusive?

At least when I call Rosemary an uneducated arrogant liar, I can provide evidence for all of it in her own words.

"DO THE MATH", for example, for arrogance. "25.6 Million Joules" for the lie. "A Joule is a Watt Per Second" for uneducated.

I am lolling even more now.

[Magluvin]

Sure, I know exactly what your talking about...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SV0mtuko4M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlgdCyoUNAk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHaJzoUDfrw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea7E8Au0AkE

But ya could have stopped it all by just posting a vid of what made that rotor accelerate.
Motor, battery, fishingline on the pulley on top. But no. You claimed that it only worked with certain magnets out of the bunch. You gave tips on bearings, etc.
You let it continue.

And Just saying that you never made a claim of Ou and such, just pushed people harder because one rumor going around was that you were silenced.

Just a 1 min vid would have been all it would have took.

So yea. I know quite a bit.

Mags

[Magluvin]

Lol  that vid was up for only 27 min.   Exactly why was that T?  Waaas there an issue? Hmmm?

Mags

[fuzzytomcat]

***** BUMP *****  THREAD GOING OFF TOPIC FLAME BREAK
___________________________________________________________________________________________

Rosemary,

If your not a coward ..... and still say your device has a COP>INFINITY ....

I WANT TO BROADCAST IT "LIVE" ON MY WEB SITE FOR THE WORLD TO SEE !!!

UNLESS YOUR A COWARD !!!


http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org


Fuzzy

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear eatenbyagrue

You really are a gentleman and a scholar.  Which, I might tell you, are precisely those attributes that I most admire in a man.  Rare on these forums, occupied as they are with rampant opportunists.  And I see how you're trying to protect me from making any mistakes.  But that's the price of open source - eatenbyagrue.  If one is wrong then one is wrong in public.   And, indeed, you present a good argument - so it seems that I most probably am wrong.  And I'm well aware that most of our members are satisfied on this.  But I personally and unfortunately am not satisfied and never have been.  And while you're trying to promote me as a good scientist - I'm really only a reasonably good amateur theorist.  So it is more than likely that I will 'err' - as Poynty says.  Fortunately I have no axe to grind on this issue.  That analysis is my own assessment of a result that has no part of our official claim.  And it's simply based on my own ball park evaluation of battery performance against the energy dissipated at the load resistor.  I would have absolutely no hesitation in owning up if I am wrong.  I have nothing to lose - provided only that science wins.  I trust my history has been proof of this.   

Now.  Here's how I've been given to understand this.  To begin with Wiki defines a watt as 1 joule per second.  And correspondingly it defines 1 joule as 1 watt per second.  In other words the 'time' factor is integrated into that equation.  Now.  In the past I have been to great pains to ensure that we do not use the transfer of heat into water - precisely to obviate this argument - as your own assessment here is also a widely held opinion.  Far be it from me to presume to correct anything at all.  I'm only here presenting the counter argument.  Golly.  I see I last posted at 8'30'ish last night. Anyway - here's the counter argument.  I'm going to bullet schedule the points in the hopes of keeping this readable.  And I'll start another post in the interest of keeping each post relatively brief and relatively readable.  Bear with me.