another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[The Boss]

 
Where is the test ?

[fuzzytomcat]

FTC,

I really don't see the need for the use of such language on this or any thread.  I also do not believe that it falls within acceptable guidelines for this fourm.

As MH stated several posts back, I too think everyone needs to cool off a bit.  All should be free to state their case or raise concerns and questions, but I see no need for emotional, angry, or vile disrespect towards anyone.

PW

PW, check the OU search http://www.overunity.com/search/ you will find around eleven pages of the word I used here at OU

After two (2) years of the slanderous remarks made about me from theft to throwing testing and evaluation of the COP>17 experimental device modified replication of mine over and over again by Rosemary without exception she deserves no respect from me, nor will I give her any.

Plain and simple shes a "FRAUD" and proven as such in five other forums over 7000 postings of hers later she has been banned from .... this is the last one available for her crap she dishes out. 

I think you should be checking out the forum history starting in 2009. 

Here's my data from the COP>17 testing and evaluation done  https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=6b7817c40bb20460#cid=6B7817C40BB20460&id=6B7817C40BB20460!120  twenty two (22) verifiable tests .... you have any PW ??

** Maybe a few 5 hour non stop videos recorded "LIVE" on my streaming broadcast channel ??
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_6d255c76-9e9a-42ae-a565-fbc698e0b6df
http://www.livestream.com/opensourceresearchanddevelopment/video?clipId=pla_12671fda-04e2-403e-8560-ab593683a646

FTC


** added

[picowatt]

Rosemary,

I read a bit more of your posts.  They are difficult for me to read, as I typically just ignore or gloss over all posts that are of such "tones" on this thread.

As to "endorsing" a video from TK, I can only recall doing so with regard to his video demonstrating the ringing that can occur dependent on wire length (I believe it was a green wire).  You immediately jumped on it as somehow fraudulent.  I saw no attempts at "trickery", indeed, I have seen similar actions when making measurements.  A wire is not always "just a wire".

Regarding an AC scope setting, I never stated or implied that setting the 'scope to AC coupled would in any way affect or damage the 'scope.  You would, however, lose all your DC data and all 'scope captures performed in AC coupled mode would be missing a lot of data that can currently be visually extracted from your DC captures.

Your explanations regarding how to use or read a 'scope are, frankly, totally wrong.  We are not talking about COP, particle physics, electrons or whatever.  This relates only to how to use and read a 'scope, which is fully documented by users manuals and well known by those who have used all manner of 'scopes for many years.

As to "demanding" an answer, I did no such thing.  I asked my questions more that once as I thought my questions were being lost in the ensuing fray.  Time zones or not, it seems the continuing battle with other posters was more worthy of a response than a legitimate queston regarding your papers.  Even now, I do not demand an answer.  If someone on your team has a logical explanation regarding my concerns that you care to share, it would be much appreciated.  If not, that is fine as well.   

If you feel it is appropriate to tell me how to ask my questions properly, then I as well can suggest that a simple "that's interesting, I do not know the answer and will have my team look into it" from you might just as well have been appropriate.     

If you do not want your data examined, your papers read, your circuit replicated, then just say so.  I would, however, be even moreso puzzled as to the purpose of this thread.

You should find solace in the fact that, in the future, I will be reading and posting here less, as it is just to difficult to deal with all the non-tech related emotionalism on this thread.  I find it all very non-productive.

PW

[hartiberlin]

Okay,
Rosemary aggreed to do new tests on her circuit with the 555 timer being powered by the same battery pack
and will also do a battery charge status test.

Until then I will lock this thread and when she will come
back with her new data, I will open up a new thread for her.

As this thread went too controvers, it is just time to let new measurements speak fro themself.

So stay tuned.


Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Okay, Rosemary
agreed to do tests with such a circuit as attached.

She will also do battery charge tests before and after the experiment.

This will take some time and until then this thread remains closed.

P.S: This attached circuit diagramm was quickly hand drawn by me in a painting program and
just represents black boxes, surely the 555 timer circuit will have some pots
to control the settings..
and the L and C is just a lowpassfilter to filter out any spikes for the supply voltage
of the 555 timer, so the 555 timer gets a clean supply DC voltage of about 12 Volts.

Regards, Stefan.