another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

So.  Poynty,
[snip]
I await word and put it to you that should you refuse to engage - then there is an EXPLICIT acknowledgement of our Claim.

And guys, may I add.  I have not heard from Professor E Jones.  He has expressed every interest to get this tested.  If he also does not engage - then presumably he also concedes defeat.

How quaint. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

How quaint. 

Pointy - may I say.  I find your comment here to be lacking in relevance or indeed argument.  You're in the unhappy position of either needing to defend your stance or endorse our claim.  In the absence of engaging then I assume that you have none.  Or that you can't.  Either way I think you need to publicly withdraw your offer of a prize as clearly it was a RUSE to lure our poor unsuspecting claimants into a trap.  I rather suspect that they relied on you to give a scientific dissertation - or at its least - a scientific argument.  Actually, I think we all did.  And as it turns out - not only can you NOT do a standard exercise in power analysis but that your commitment is to deny and deny and deny.  Which is unfortunate.  But - thankfully - this little exercise has exposed that motive.

Take care Poynty Point.
Kindest regards, as ever,
Rosie Pose

Here's a more adequate and impartial analysis of what has actually been going on.
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2012/01/more-niceties-related-to-that.html

[poynt99]

Rosemary, I have a question for you. It doesn't directly pertain to the oscillation, but it is related and I am curious to know how you think about this.

Here it is:

If we could separate the connection to the battery positive terminal from your circuit into 2 connections, one only allowing the battery to discharge (current from the battery), and one only allowing it to charge (current to the battery), based on your theory that the battery is receiving a net charge overall, what would we expect to see in terms of current flow on those two paths?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary, I have a question for you. It doesn't directly pertain to the oscillation, but it is related and I am curious to know how you think about this.

Here it is:

If we could separate the connection to the battery positive terminal from your circuit into 2 connections, one only allowing the battery to discharge (current from the battery), and one only allowing it to charge (current to the battery), based on your theory that the battery is receiving a net charge overall, what would we expect to see in terms of current flow on those two paths?

Poynty.  I have no idea.  And I'm not sure that it will serve anyone that I now start to speculate.  I wonder if I could impose on you to answer a SLEW of questions that I've put to you related to your counterclaim?  That would have the very real merit of being 'on topic'. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[poynt99]

Poynty.  I have no idea.  And I'm not sure that it will serve anyone that I now start to speculate.  I wonder if I could impose on you to answer a SLEW of questions that I've put to you related to your counterclaim?  That would have the very real merit of being 'on topic'. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

I see. 

I had the distinct impression that you felt you had a rather good handle on the current flow into and out of the battery, since your entire claim seems to ride on the notion that more current (and hence charge) goes back to the battery than what comes out of it. Isn't part of your claim that your COP= INFINITY? I guess I was mistaken.