another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

TK - Why do you go on and on and on ... about this?

Rosemary, what is the difference between power and energy?

I have absolutely NO idea how to answer it in any abbreviated form that would be appropriate for these posts.  WHAT energy are you talking about?  From the top of my head I know there's chemical energy - magnetic energy  - nuclear energy.  There's energy of mass.  There's radiant energy.  And I don't think I've even skimmed the surface.  And Power - as I understand it - is the rate at which any one of those various types of energy is transferred.   Now. Let's see if YOU can answer a question.  WHY DO YOU ASK?  Is it because you ASSUME that I don't have an answer?  Is this some kind of 'test' where you can gauge my competence?  Are you satisfied that you can LURK in the background - and then impose these irrelevancies on this thread?

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys, it seems that Professor Steven E Jones is going to FIRST make a study of this thread to get more familiar with the question.  What alarms me is that the thread is now some 30 odd pages long.  Which means that we're due to wait for some considerable time before that SIMPLE question of mine is EVER ANSWERED.  And the worst of it is that this question is more or less the ONLY subject of contention from the inception of my dialogue - if it can even be described as a dialogue  - with Poynty Point.

Why this ALARMS me is that I've had to wait a whole month before acknowledgement of our claim for his prize.  And then a week with STILL no acknowledgement of the previous posting of my link.  And - like as not - he'll now NOT BE ABLE TO FIND HIS WAY HERE - notwithstanding.  So.  I'ts a waiting game.  Which irritates me more than I can say.  It seems he can access any thread at any forum - at EASE.  But for some reason is is ENTIRELY UNAWARE OF THIS ONE and I've now posted 2 LINKS in his own thread.  As I've said before.  It gets curiouser and curiouser.

And Bubba - I'm not even going to answer your proposal.  That's not an explanation.  That's an excuse.

Regards,
Rosemary

[JouleSeeker]

Rose:

And - like as not - he'll now NOT BE ABLE TO FIND HIS WAY HERE - notwithstanding.

I found my way here.
But yes, it will take me a bit of time to catch up so I can comment properly. 

Believe it or not, my own work keeps me fairly busy...  but I hope to contribute.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rose:

I found my way here.
But yes, it will take me a bit of time to catch up so I can comment properly. 

Believe it or not, my own work keeps me fairly busy...  but I hope to contribute.

Dear Professor,

I am DELIGHTED to welcome you to this thread.  At LAST.  Now.  You'll see for yourself that there is only one question outstanding.  Poynty Point has gone to some lengths to assure us that he won't consider our prize unless and until we CONCEDE that he can REPRESENT our energy delivered by the battery - as a negative wattage.   IF he does this then he DEFEATS our CLAIM and any other claim that may be  associated with any switching circuit.  AND then he would NEVER need to part with his prize. 

Now.  That's the argument.  I'm not sure how MUCH more you need to read than that.  But you'll simply see him saying this over, and over and over - through the entire thread from page 3 or thereby.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Magluvin]

Well if we consider the term Horse Power/HP, can we not say that that a certain amount of Energy can be extracted and used from a device that has (x)HP output  over time.  ;]
Or can we say, if we have a certain amount of Horse Energy/HE, we will have a certain amount of Power available for use. ;]



Mags