another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[hartiberlin]

Rosemary,
where is the circuit diagramm of the 555 timer test ?

Did I miss this ?

Please post again the links to it and to your latest PDF papers...
Thanks-

[poynt99]

Stefan,

My investigation into the FG issue revealed that it's important to consider whether the bias is set to a negative or positive value. This determines which MOSFET is active, and which is not. In either case, the MOSFETs require a good AC path to ground, and it appears the FG is providing that in one case. I doubt very much that the FG is supplying the 30 some Watts of power going to the load however, especially considering there is a 50 Ohm resistor on its output.

If Rosemary does a test with a 555 timer as the driver, I would like to see a 50 Ohm resistor connected to its output as well. This way, we'll see if the circuit still oscillates. Without the resistor, I am quite sure it will.

The real issues are 1) Rosemary's battery energy calculations (per TK), and 2) her battery voltage measurement, which I intend to clear up soon.

It would be far more productive imho, if the focus was on some of the tests we have suggested in the recent and distant past, which would provide definitive evidence that the circuit is underunity.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys

We've got a very sick member of the family.  I need to rally.  I'll post here at the weekend - hopefully.

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Harti,

Again.  The circuit is per out schematic included in our paper.  I'll see if I can download again.  The differences are ONLY in the applied signal.  Not from a function generator - but a 555.  And there is only 1 x Q1 and 1 x Q2.   Do you get it yet?  If not, then let me know.  If you want a circuit diagram of a 555 - there are many available on the internet.  They all work - with varying levels of efficiency.  THEN.  Where you see 'load' RL1 - just picture - in your mind's eye - that we've got a battery operated solder iron in place of the element resistor that we reference in our paper.  And OBVIOUSLY the shunt resistor.  This is still 0.25 Ohms ... I think.  Actually - it may have been 0.2 Ohms.  Can't actually remember. 

I'm not sure that I ever did download the waveforms.  And I'm not about to wade through those multiple pages of 'flamed' threads to find them.  I do, however, have some downloads where this was tested from our own batteries.  I'll try and find them.   

Rosemary,
where is the circuit diagramm of the 555 timer test ?

Did I miss this ?

Please post again the links to it and to your latest PDF papers...
Thanks-

About our papers.  I have sent you copies of these per email.  Have you lost these?  If so, again.  Let me know.  I'll send them again for your private perusal.  I've been advised NOT to publish these here until such time as they're published as reviewed papers.  Which is immanent. 

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello Poynty Point

May I impose on your to clarify these comments.

My investigation into the FG issue revealed that it's important to consider whether the bias is set to a negative or positive value.

What setting to what 'negative bias'? 

This determines which MOSFET is active, and which is not. In either case, the MOSFETs require a good AC path to ground

When does a MOSFET require an AC PATH?  And what GROUND are you referring to?

and it appears the FG is providing that in one case.

In WHICH 'case' are you referring to?  And how exactly is this managed?

I doubt very much that the FG is supplying the 30 some Watts of power going to the load however, especially considering there is a 50 Ohm resistor on its output.

Where EXACTLY is that 50 Ohm resistor in any of our schematics.  And when does a MOSFET ever OUTPUT anything at all?

If Rosemary does a test with a 555 timer as the driver, I would like to see a 50 Ohm resistor connected to its output as well.

Are you now requiring us to increase the applied resistance - and IF SO WHY?  Quite apart from which can you NOT REMEMBER that I've already said I won't be doing more tests?  Not until you have provided guarantees that ANY SUCH TEST will be conclusive for our claims for your PRIZES? Do you remember this Poynty?  The WHOLE purpose of my reopening this thread was for purposes of CLAIMING YOUR PRIZES.

This way, we'll see if the circuit still oscillates. Without the resistor, I am quite sure it will.

Why should we do this test 'without the resistor'?  It seems somewhat pointless. 

The real issues are 1) Rosemary's battery energy calculations (per TK),

Is this yet more 'INFERENCE' to a small mistake I made in calculations?  And can I thereby construe that you abusing it's value in order to detract from the actual claim as detailed in that paper?

and 2) her battery voltage measurement, which I intend to clear up soon.

WHAT battery voltage is that?  I am not sure that we have CLAIMED anything at all about the battery voltage in our paper.  In point of fact we ONLY stressed that we have NOT considered battery voltage.  Do I need to explain this as well?  Again? May I IMPOSE on you to keep your comments RELEVANT TO OUR CLAIM.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary