another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This if for Schubert and, possibly, Flux It - if you're interested. 

Here are some of those pictures that Poynty posted in my previously 'locked thread'.  Can't remember which because there seems to have been so many of them.  In any event I had a couple of downloads on file.  Here they are.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

And Flux It.  Thanks for giving me that 'link'.   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And guys,

Here's another schematic that may be of assistance.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

Those circuit are totally different from the one posted before, look like the second in this page are correct Mosfet positively biased can pulse your inductor in a normal way...
In the first look like the gate is controlled an inductor just like a Bedini...
But the -5 Volts generator still bother me, it look like the + side is connected to ground side of the circuit but the polarity is reversed, look like you have a -5 Volts at the ground side and a 0 Volts a the + side...
Do you try a split the positive config ?
But the split the positive is more like putting for example two + side of battery facing each other:
For example a "Bedini" radiant config will be - //////+ > -//////+ > +//////-
Positive split at the two last batteries !

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Those circuit are totally different from the one posted before, look like the second in this page are correct Mosfet positively biased can pulse your inductor in a normal way...
In the first look like the gate is controlled an inductor just like a Bedini...
But the -5 Volts generator still bother me, it look like the + side is connected to ground side of the circuit but the polarity is reversed, look like you have a -5 Volts at the ground side and a 0 Volts a the + side...
Do you try a split the positive config ?
But the split the positive is more like putting for example two + side of battery facing each other:
For example a "Bedini" radiant config will be - //////+ > -//////+ > +//////-
Positive split at the two last batteries !

Hello Schubert.  I need to you check those circuits again.  You'll see that they're not standard.  Just check the MOSFET config.  I'll post the schematic again on the actual arrangement of those transistors.  That's where the magic is.  My email address is ainslie@mweb.co.za.  Send me your email and I'll forward you our papers.  Then you'll understand the whole thing better.  You're missing the significance of that Q-array - which is Q1 Drain to Q2 Drain.  Q1 Source to Q2 Gate.  Q2 Source to Q1 Gate.  Pointy was the first to get this simulated.  But we've got loads of sim examples - and they all have that negative wattage anomaly.  The circuit is per our schematic.  If you look closely you'll see that the Q2 Source goes nowhere - other than to the ground of the signal probe.

But let me see if I can find that diagram that I did on the MOSFET connections.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

I'm afraid they're both rather faint.  Hopefully you can read them.  And don't bother to read the 'blurb'.  It's just something I wrote to try and clarify the same thing - for someone else.  Sorry Schubert - but that's the best I can manage.  I've lost another one that I did which is marginally easier to see.

ADDED.  I'm taking out these two of mine because I know they're barely readable.  And it just takes up space.  Thanks again Groundloop.

Rosie

[Groundloop]

Better contrast.