another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

For some reason Glen first included then omitted - this sketched diagram showing the Q-array.  If anyone wants to check it out - this is the actual method of attachment for those resistors.  And I wonder if I could caution you all to discount the most of Glen's posts.  They dominate each page - intentionally - and yet are all designed to mislead you.  That is for those of you who are trying to set up your experiments here. 

Hopefully they'll download.  I've copied it off Groundloop's copy which was considerably more readable than my own.  Thanks again Groundloop.  I seriously regret that you're not around to guide us all out of this quagmire.  But I also respect your decisions.  And may I add that I'm well aware of your efforts into new research on OUR.com - and sorry to see that this has now stopped.  Perhaps one day you'll give us an update on this valuable work.  I, for one, am in awe of your expertise.

Kindest regards to you all
Rosemary. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And here's the second diagram.  Hopefully that helps.  And if any of you are clever enough to apply this to your own sims - then that would be a really quick and easy path to exploring that oscillation.  I'll try and explain more about the significance when I can squeeze in between Glen Lettenmaier's posts.  He's trying to take over this discussion.  And it's NOT to advance this study.  More's the pity.

Kindest again
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

Is this RIGHT, Rosemary, or is it WRONG?

quoting Rosemary Ainslie:

NOW.  Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands.  We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception.  Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged.  We've had those batteries since January 2010.  We've been running them since August 2010.  I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities.  They're 40 ampere hours each.  We've used 6 of them continually since that time.  According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries.  That gives a work potential - a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.  And that was just one test.  Now.  Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive.  Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH.  They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED.

Right, or Wrong?

Tell us, Rosemary. You made the claim, you cited the numbers and performed the calculations upon which your claim is based...... now tell us whether it's RIGHT OR WRONG.


Is a Joule really a Watt per Second??

"In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating." This is a FALSE CLAIM, based on your wrong calculations.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Is this RIGHT, Rosemary, or is it WRONG?

quoting Rosemary Ainslie:
Right, or Wrong?

Tell us, Rosemary. You made the claim, you cited the numbers and performed the calculations upon which your claim is based...... now tell us whether it's RIGHT OR WRONG.


Is a Joule really a Watt per Second??

"In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating." This is a FALSE CLAIM, based on your wrong calculations.

And so it goes guys.    At least we now know who are the protagonists and who the activists in this drive to over unity.  Hopefully the day will come when these  'protagonists' for want of a more respectable title -  will be accountable for their well rehearsed skills at flaming these threads of mine.

Again, regards,
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

An open letter to Stefan Hartmann:

Stefan: I have repeatedly shown how Rosemary Ainslie's claim is based on incorrect math and incorrect understanding of power and energy units and their relationships. I have cited her own words and shown specifically where and how her calculations have been done incorrectly. The correct calculations, based on her own data, show that the claim that she makes is FALSE. I have asked her to either justify her calculations and show that she is correct and I am wrong, or to correct her calculations and RETRACT her claim of overunity performance and her application for the various prizes that you and Prof. Jones are offering.
The fact that she refuses to do either of these things, yet allows the claim to stand uncorrected in spite of the manifest fatal errors, shows that she is engaging in wilful scientific misconduct. The fact that you are allowing this claim to stand, unchallenged and uncorrected, indicates a certain lack of rigor on your own part. I believe that you have sufficient understanding of mathematics and energy/power calculations to see for yourself, by reading carefully and performing your own calculations, that her claim is unsupported by her data.
I sincerely hope that you consider the effect on the FE community that results from allowing FALSE CLAIMS to stand without correction.
Regards--
TinselKoala