another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[energy1234hope]

Troll alert more rubbish from the trolls its rosemarys thread, heard all your crap before you and your cut and paste crap go away.It was peaceful until you turned up.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Troll alert more rubbish from the trolls its rosemarys thread, heard all your crap before you and your cut and paste crap go away.It was peaceful until you turned up.

Hi energy123
I noticed your earlier comment on this.  I'm afraid this goes with the territory.  It seems that all my threads get flamed - sooner or later.  I think
the trick is to apply that scroll button.  And if anyone posting here could remember to press that shift button.  Else your posts fall of the page.
Which is the general intention.

The only decent thing is that Stefan won't just close this thread again.  Which is comforting.  But it would be so nice if he could do something
about Glen's attempt at wrecking it's readability.  It's no good applying to Glen.  He has no basic understanding of professional conduct.  I think
he's under the delusion that this is all assisting in is promotion of some internet live programming - or something.  It's confusing.
His language skills are not up to par which means that whatever it is he's trying to advertise is rather lost.  Which is also why he needs to cut and
paste.  He can't simply 'write' an original post.  BUT.  Frankly, between you and me, I'm rather sorry for him.  I'm not sure that his behaviour can
be considered balanced.  I think he's been 'beset' by the 'green eyed monster'.  But do what I do.  Just try and ignore his posts.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[hartiberlin]

I won´t ban Rosemary , I just want to see, if she will finally do
the battery tests...

Also TinselKoala did some new Youtube videos about the oscillations
and they seem to depend on the used function generators...

So probably these oscillations will capacitively input energy from the function generator into the circuit and thus
into the batteries.

So a battery test with just a 555 timer powered by the main battery is a must.

Just forget the function generator for precise Energy efficiency calculatiions...
This is just flawed...

Regards, Stefan.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I won´t ban Rosemary , I just want to see, if she will finally do
the battery tests...

Also TinselKoala did some new Youtube videos about the oscillations
and they seem to depend on the used function generators...

So probably these oscillations will capacitively input energy from the function generator into the circuit and thus
into the batteries.

So a battery test with just a 555 timer powered by the main battery is a must.

Just forget the function generator for precise Energy efficiency calculatiions...
This is just flawed...

Regards, Stefan.

Stefan - thanks for the undertaking.  I think it was agreed the last time I was re-instated.  But I wonder if you could impose on Glen to curtail
all that extraneous 'cut and paste' nonsense.  It's overwhelming this thread.  Conservatively he dominates approximately one third of each page
in his efforts to discourage readership.  I don't think you're giving me a fair chance here - with respect.

Then.  Regarding the function generator.  I have designed a test that will first be run to prove whether or not the function generator is responsible
for this extra energy - as you claim.  Where would we be if we did not allow experimental evidence to guide us?  I would have thought?

Regarding TK's videos - they only prove that the function generator CAN supply energy - provided that he maintains a closed circuit - which he
manages with those diodes of his.  You'll notice that the applied voltage from the generator is at a whopping 10 volts - while the circuit only has
3.  And the only resistance in the way of that applied voltage is that little inductor of his.  Hardly enough to resist all that applied potential
difference.  Frankly, under those conditions - I'd be rather amazed that the function generator did NOT manage to apply its energy.  But it's
hardly consistent with either our tests or our claim.  I'm intrigued to see that you think it is.  In any event.  Whether it is or not - will be easily
demonstrated with our proposed test of the 555.  I don't think we'll ever be able to dissipate the required 50 watts unless we use the function
generator.  And anything short of that is a waste of time.

And guys, Poynty - all - PLEASE advise if I've left out any considerations in that proposed test.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[powercat]

@ enrgy123hope
You accuse Fuzzy of being a Troll, at least Fuzzy has built and tested the circuit unlike you, so who is the real troll ?
why don't you build the circuit ?