another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Magluvin]

These oscillations. Do they have anything to do with the inductor/transformer? Battery in or out.
If so, then how does current flow through it at all in oscilation form if the battery is out of the chain or loop, as the circuit is broken without the battery? What circuit are you representing exactly?

Would not putting an led(a diode by nature) across the primary(said inductor) cause issue with bidirectional current through the primary(said inductor)? Does current choose to flow through the led/diode or does it flow through the Primary(said inductor) when they are  in parallel and current is in the direction that would bias the led?

And, having the other led on the secondary(not the said inductor) would cause the inductance of the primary(said inductor) to change drastically because of the load on the secondary when currents are in the proper direction to do so.

So you have in one current direction, current flowing through the primary side LED, and if the led lights then there is no current flowing in the primary(said inductor) during that phase. So the said inductor is not in the circuit during that phase of oscillation.

This is not the circuit shown on paper in the vid.   Far from it actually.

Those leds are not in the Rose circuit the way you are presenting TK
This is not representative of Roses circuit.  That said inductor is only in the circuit during 1 phase of operation, as the primary led takes all the circuit current instead of flowing through the primary during one phase of operation, being that the led/diode is in parallel with the primary.

And with the other led conducting on the secondary during the other phase of operation, any inductance values assumed on the primary are no longer valid.

And to say that those circuit modifications dont really matter..... Then why do you have an inductor at all? Why one that is unidirectional, disfunctional one from the Outer Limits? Why not the prescribed circuit on the paper, with 6 silver oxides, and then what, will you set on the generator for 500v and say it is an accurate replication?

Why did you change the circuit and clearly represent it as what is on the paper?
Stand before a Judge in court and pull that crap and say so long to your self being credible any longer.  Isnt this the kind of stuff you try to debunk? People faking it?

Lets just connect some 4 awg cable from the positive of the 3v batteries to the negative and call it an accurate replication of the circuit on that paper in the vid. 

Mags

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL.  Hello Seamonkey,

Such a welcome relief to read your post.  Thanks for the encouragement.  But the battle's nowhere near won.  But it's nice to see that my poor efforts are appreciated.  And you're right.  There's a patent inability for these 'men' to relate to a woman in the context of science.  All men, as a rule, are more competitive than women.  And I think our trolls are more competitive than most men.  I'm looking forward to day when they wake up and see that I'm NOT actually in competition.  I couldn't be - even if I tried.  I lack the motivation, training and skills.  I'm only pointing to a technology that - if they took the trouble to test it - would allow them to compete rather well - in all kinds of ways.

But it's always nice to see support.  God knows there's been very little evidence of it.

Kindest regards SeaMonkey. 
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This fellows measurements shown on the following video show a substantial amount of power from
the signal generator is bypassing the MOSFETS and getting to the heater load. 
In fact once the power from the battery is connected the power entering the Heater load actually drops drastically. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9TNFuvM2k&feature=autoshare

Hello AbbaRue
If you look at the context of these last 3 pages or thereby - you'll see we've been discussing this at length.  Indeed it appears that this fellow is getting more power from the function generator than from the battery.  It's ingenious.  You'll also notice that he's reconfigured the entire circuit by changing the MOSFET legs in that last little Q2 variant.  There's no apparent limit to his skills.  We all need to follow his work rather closely.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Magluvin]

Ok. Those 3 posts were written in 3 separate posts for a reason.

They each make a point, in the order I wanted them to.

It all boils down to this.

This vid is not credible. It is a misrepresentation of the RA circuit.

So how do we know if any of the rest of the setup in the vid includes other changes
also like the ones I clearly exposed?

Do we take his word for it?   


Magsleeps good at night   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Ok. Those 3 posts were written in 3 separate posts for a reason.

They each make a point, in the order I wanted them to.

It all boils down to this.

This vid is not credible. It is a misrepresentation of the RA circuit.

So how do we know if any of the rest of the setup in the vid includes other changes
also like the ones I clearly exposed?

Do we take his word for it?   


Magsleeps good at night   

Hi Magsy.
As ever your posts are GOLD.  The more so as they always leave me smiling.  I'll get around to answering them soon.  Good night Magsy.  You've done good. As always,

Kindest regards,
Rosie