Video On line, Proof Of Overunity With Permanent Magnets, LaFonte Research

[gammarayburst]

Vidar, Please look at Marks pendlum video. It shows plane as day the is no problem with the principle. Also please see video's on youtube at our site, lafonte research.
Thanks,
Butch laFonte

[nightlife]

Vidar, Please look at Marks pendlum video. It shows plane as day the is no problem with the principle. Also please see video's on youtube at our site, lafonte research.
Thanks,
Butch laFonte

I did watch those videos and it is plain as day that they show no proof of overunity. Calculate the actions and stop kidding yourself.

[Low-Q]

Vidar, Please look at Marks pendlum video. It shows plane as day the is no problem with the principle. Also please see video's on youtube at our site, lafonte research.
Thanks,
Butch laFonte

I look forward to see a working prototype, and I hope to see no excuse like "problems with the design", "Mark has retired", We need to make some adjustments", "We are not able to make it work again because we tried to adjust it", "...and my camcorder did not work when the machine ran for several hours".


Vidar

[Cloxxki]

Butch, I respect your choice to post your full name, but I call, SHOUT b-s that a grown man should always do so in an arguement.
Only grey, old, grumpy folks ever come with that kind of demand. Don't deal with the internet if you can't deal with it.


Your name offers no added value to your claimes, and my lack of name doesn't take away from mine.
Recently I did share my name, and immediately I had a very intrusive email stalker, involving many people I did not know. Doing so with his name seemed to make it alright for him to invade my privacy, insult me, threaten me, etc.


I have around 100,000 web posts to this nickname over the past decade or longer, in 4 languages on various fields of interest. I have a very consistent open source posting style. Supportive yet critical. This is as good as an identity as they come.
I happen to be a pretty bright guy, IQ and EQ tests tell me so. If you can't explain me why you've got OU with a 4-part device, you're going to have a really hard time going past one full rotation in any variation to it. Convince me though, and before you know it, open source designs based on your finding will start popping up on you.


Just making video of a moving magnet and pointing at it doesn't make you the great inventor that gave the world overunity. We had cloudseeder who thought the same thing. He gave the world his work, they only had to build it, so he could go on to next great inventions. Vague discriptions, no math, no loop or full rotation.


The hardest job for successful OU inventors, is to get across the message. Dozens may have had a working device in their workshops, working an working for days on end without input. But no-one ever managed to explain it sufficiently to someone to replicate and document once and for all.


I am here to help you. I am a novice in OU research, but I learn quickly and am determined to help advance its arrival, and subsequent implementation.


In magnets, you're always presented by a problem, which can usually be overcome. Only to immediately present the next problem. That's the stage in which you are now, as far as I can tell. You can't say that you have OU, when you haven't solve the current problem without getting a new one in return.


Good luck,


J

[gammarayburst]

I look forward to see a working prototype, and I hope to see no excuse like "problems with the design", "Mark has retired", We need to make some adjustments", "We are not able to make it work again because we tried to adjust it", "...and my camcorder did not work when the machine ran for several hours".


Vidar

Vidar, We have never made any of these statements that I can recall? The camcorder thing for sure.
Butch