SMOT

[FreeEnergy]

[PaulLowrance]

Dear Stefan,

--- In Prometheus_Effect@yahoogroups.com, "overunity2001" <harti@h...>
wrote:
>
> Paul,
> you simply ignore the facts...
> You just don�t have studied when we
> did study it already in 1999.

I ignore the facts? Seems the other way around Stefan. You still can't point out the error in my assessment. You just keep saying it
doesn't matter, yet you even just now finally admitted it would be better to change the tests.


> I agree, that it would better to have a longer much
> higher ramp to see the effect much better or have Greg shown
> his closed loop device.

Thank you for at least admitting the tests need improvement. Making the ramp higher is not going to prove anything Stefan. I am working on free energy research but it is this constant fuzzy logic that destroys the reputation of this industry. I am embarrassed to mention my research to any real scientist.

I gave you two legitimate separate tests. One of them is extremely simple, cheap, and would take hardly any time. Why can't you address that? I have asked you numerous times. What exactly happens if you place a flat horizontal surface such as glass or whatever at the end of the SMOT? Does the steel ball break free from the permanent magnets? If so, which I very much doubt, then could someone upload a video of it?

Sincerely,
Paul

[PaulLowrance]

Dear FreeEnergy,

I am uncertain if your posts pertain to my suggested test.  If so then it's not relavent because you are still dropping the ball down to a lower level then where it started.  Could someone just be straightforward here and tell me what happens when you replace the ramp with a flat surface? ... at the same level where the ball moves up to of course.

Paul

[Kysmett]

Paul,

The ball will not break free if there is a level area at the top.  I fail to see, however, how that discredits this from being significant.  I agree with you that there is a friction loss at the fall, because all of the verticle momentum is lost on impact.

Here is what I propose as a cure for this:

At the top, in order to transition to the original level a quarter round piece should be used so that the verticle momentum is translated into the horizontal.  This will give the momentum needed to reach the next 'gate'.

If this is done, then the next step will be to try and get measurable 'work' out of this.  To take it from novelty to application.  If you look at the jpegs I posted, I have already hypothesized how this can be accomplished.

[PaulLowrance]

Dear Kysmett,

The ball will not break free if there is a level area at the top.? I fail to see, however, how that discredits this from being significant.? I agree with you that there is a friction loss at the fall, because all of the verticle momentum is lost on impact.

This would be a way to prove free energy.? The fact that the ball cannot break free from the magnets is that much more evidence this is not a free energy or OU system.? Additionally it provides a near zero friction method of proving free energy.? If they can't get the ball to break free from magnets then it proves no OU.? If it truly is OU then all they would have to do is lower ramp angle so that the magnets will pull the ball even faster.? In other words, the ball would climb at a more level angle.? If it is truly OU then there should be a low enough angle where the ball would escape the magnets.? I would even accept low angles such as -> ball starting level is 30mm, ball ending level after magnets is 30.5mm.? If it's 13% efficient then surely the ball could break free with only 0.5mm height difference.? As you know, the magnet fulling force remains the same but since the magnets don't have to pull the ball up as steep angle then he ball will accelerate faster.? I don't think they can do it because this whole idea is crazy.? I see it as a balanced system. In other words, first half of cycle the magnets pull against gravity, then second half of cycle is just a reverse of gravity pulling against magnets.

Here is what I propose as a cure for this:

At the top, in order to transition to the original level a quarter round piece should be used so that the verticle momentum is translated into the horizontal.? This will give the momentum needed to reach the next 'gate'.

If this is done, then the next step will be to try and get measurable 'work' out of this.? To take it from novelty to application.? If you look at the jpegs I posted, I have already hypothesized how this can be accomplished.

If I get time I'll look at your idea, but this thing about friction is easy to disprove.? Why not use Teflon 1/4 tube with lubricant.? The friction would drop considerably, but they'll find that the ball will never go higher than it started.? The videos I saw start at 30mm and went to 23mm.

I am told this distraction has been taking place since 1997.? Hey, they don't need to kill scientists anymore.? They only need to have dozens of people flood this community with garbage and noise as distractions.? Extremely clever if true.? Since it's such a clever and obviously effective idea then don't you think they would do it, at least the trillion dollar oil companies?? It's perfectly legal.? It's so easy to waiste peoples time.? Look at how much of my time is already wasted on this SMOT.? IMHO the RV is yet another example.

I'll be happy when the world gets free energy.

Sincerely,
Paul