Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Thanks for those references from the past, Fuzzy. I note once again that she lies, misrepresents, and misunderstands (willfully) my earlier work with her first bogus miracle circuit. Whenever I see that crap it makes my blood boil and I have to set the record straight, or she will run off thinking she's vindicated.

Quoting the post that mentions my work:

I'm not sure that the question of TinselKoala can be entirely dropped.  I remain deeply concerned that the representation of a 90% duty cycle is only achieved through the inverted position of his probes.  If so, then he is laughing at us from many, many different levels.

I'm laughing at you all right, like I laugh at all transparent liars.
My probes are positioned exactly as she specified in her diagrams. It is the DUTY CYCLE OF HER 555 TIMER that was/is inverted; this issue has been covered over and over again and I have been shown to be correct by everyone who has actually built or simmed the circuit. This goes all the way back to the various "mosfets, how do they work" illustrations that I have done. The drain (load) voltage is LOW when the mosfet is ON and the load is energized. Some of the people trying to work with this circuit STILL apparently do not understand this important point.

And the fact that he shows this in conjunction with the entire depletion of two x 24 volt batteries in the space of 10 minutes from the current flow at it's max of 2 amps - simply adds to that concern.

I have no idea what she's talking about here. She is just making this up, I think. But certainly....depending on the state of charge.... as I showed in the recent Dim Bulb test --- you can deplete a battery in a few minutes, if it's already mostly depleted.

I would also add that Oppenheimer would not allow a single sceptic on his team.

She's read a book about Robert Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project..... but she doesn't realize that Oppenheimer was a scientist, a skeptic himself, and a deep thinker. What does that have to do with the present discussion? Nothing.

And I would also point out that he is posting huge chapters from his previous forum.

"MY" previous forum? As far as I can tell, the Energetic Forum was the second place I encountered RA, after she was banned from the Naked Scientists for trying to educate the professionals there about her "circuit". Did I post some quotes from that forum, like where she claimed falsely to have a patent, or where she was trying to educate professional mosfet PWM and PS designers about mosfet switching? I don't remember but maybe I did. I remember that it was the patent claim that first made me aggressively question her and her "work", because she kept claiming to have a patent and when I researched it all I could find was a word-salad patent APPLICATION that had long since expired and that claimed a circuit that can be found in almost every MOSFET data sheet.

I can never work out the motives of such people.  The idea of an actual conspiracy still seems a little bazaar. One would assume that he would then be richly rewarded.

Unfortunately I am little rewarded for my work in a monetary sense. My motivation is simply that I don't like to see creative and talented people wasting their time chasing after mistakes and impossibilities; I don't like to see people lie about their work, I don't like to see willfully ignorant people talking down to their more learned acquaintances, I don't like to see outrageous claims made without solid support, and there's a lot more I don't like about the Ainslie affair. The way she uses people, talks behind their backs, edits old posts to change their meanings, turns on her former supporters (all her supporters have become "former" at this point) and willfully remains ignorant about her topic matter... all of this and more about her "personal style" burns me up, but worst of all is her casual attitude towards facts, accuracy, and truth in reporting.

Seems that he even has difficulty getting hold of a Fluke 123. 

Really? I used both the Flukes that she at one time or another claimed to have used: the Fluke 199 and 123 ScopeMeter toy oscilloscopes. My place of employment had them both sitting on the shelf gathering dust, as we tend to use much better equipment for our purposes. The Flukes are only generally used when a portable scope is needed or their completely isolated references are required for some reason, like differential voltage analyses. Difficulty? It was as difficult as reaching for them on the shelf and lugging them home on the bus. Here she is simply lying to try to muddy the record. I published photos of both Fluke scopes at the time, and used them to show exactly the same kinds of screen traces that she showed: meaningless aliased combs, falsely triggered and laden with artefact.

His compensations for killing this thread should then, at its least, deserve a tektronix or somesuch.  I just don't know.

That much is right--- she does not know. I had at that time, and still have, access to scopes and other test equipment that she wouldn't even be able to turn on, much less use properly. Sure, I'd like to have a fancy Tek DPSO of my very own.... but if I can simply borrow scopes that cost more than my house and car together are worth.... then why do I need to own one myself?

Also at issue is the fact that he never explains how he establishes, or actually measures, the energy delivered by the battery.

She lies again here. I explained over and over again how I did this. She is incapable of understanding the explanation, though, because it requires some understanding of the concepts involved, as well as a little basic math that is beyond her grade level... but that she could easily learn if she would only recognize her own ignorance and do something about it. Reading popular biographies of Oppenheimer and textbooks like "The Dancing Wu Li Masters " (to which she has referred several times) does not an education make.

It needs to be done with some transparent reference to the waveform across the shunt including the sum of both parts of that duty cycle.

Another misrepresentation or outright lie. I showed the entire energy flow using properly integrated instantaneous power waveforms taken from several places in the circuit. And let's take a look at the waveform across the shunt in the PRESENT CASE: where she is plainly sending massive power into her circuit that she isn't accounting for in her "calculations" and is missing because she simply does not know how to use or interpret an oscilloscope. She was and still is unable to understand the proper use of an oscilloscope to determine energy balance.

If he is using a simple current meter then it is also - quite simply - wrong.  I'm afraid I really do need to address this point - over and over - as his contributions are likely to become highly counter productive.

Apparently not counter-productive enough, since she is still trying to spread her bogus claims and bogus "measurement" methods on the internet, even DEMANDING that somebody give her a monetary prize for her BS.

I think Armagdn03's final challenge to let him build his own 555 is appropriate. 

This is the most idiotic thing yet. I STARTED  MY INVOLVEMENT with the Ains-lie affair by BUILDING HER 555 TIMER CIRCUIT, determining that the duty cycle that it produced was inverted and that this inverted duty cycle was the initial error at the heart of her claim, since I was able to REPRODUCE HER HEAT PROFILES in a load, using it. I also showed, at about that same time, properly constructed high-voltage pulsing circuits using PROPERLY designed 555 timer circuits, I even built and tested the 555 timer circuits that her sycophants built in their attempts to "correct" her original circuit... as people found that sure enough I WAS RIGHT all along about her initial 555 circuit. Some of them even admitted it, but the usual suspects like Murakami and Lindemann and Ashtweth could never bring themselves to acknowledge that I was (and am) right about that circuit, since they ranted so insultingly to me before they had actually constructed and tested it for themselves.
Also about this time RA started claiming that the 555 timer wasn't necessary at all, that a FG could be used instead. So I used a FG, and also a much better, fast rise-time pulse generator, for some of the later work, and I actually did LIVE COMPARISONS between the Ains-lie and other 555 timer circuits and the FG or pulse generator.

Final challenge indeed. Here's a final challenge, Ains-lie: TEST YOUR BATTERIES CORRECTLY and prove your claim. Your scope "math" is bullshit. The only way that YOU YOURSELF, Ains-lie, will understand, is to TEST YOUR BATTERIES by letting them run your circuit for a while, then do some kind of real run-down load test.

WHY are you not doing this?

I know why, MH knows why, .99 knows why, fuzzytomcat knows why, even Stefan knows why. It is because even YOU, Ains-lie, know that you can't support your claims with a real test. Go ahead, Ains-lie..... PROVE ME WRONG.

[TinselKoala]

Just in case there is some curiosity about the matter, in the interests of semi-full disclosure:

NO, I am not getting any monetary compensation for my work here. I am paying for all the parts out of my own pocket, all the expenses of lugging stuff to and fro, picking up parts is coming off my own dime and my own time. I'm probably out about 250 dollars in real expenses, and that's not including the little inductance meter that I hope has arrived today. All the time I'm wasting is my own, but some of it is actually costing me double because it's time and energy that I should be spending on billable-time projects in my consultancy work. In fact, if my colleagues knew (or cared) what I was doing, they would probably be lolling all over the coffee break room floor.
YES, the work I do as consultant sometimes involves stuff similar to what I've shown here. Usually it is much more complex and delicate work dealing with much more esoteric and even controversial topics. But business has been slow.

And I need a new used vehicle. I need a ten or twelve year old Jeep Cherokee 4-liter or Nissan PathFinder preferably 4WD in good mechanical condition and I need six thousand dollars to pay for it. If my usual consultancy fee is 350 PER day (plus expenses and travel), how many days would I have to bill for, in order to be able to buy my vehicle? Performing the division operation 6000/350, and neglecting expenses,  I find a bit more than 18 days. Call it 20, allowing for coffee breaks.

Now I'm really starting to get depressed.

[hartiberlin]

Hi All,
today I got an email from R. Ainsley´s lawyer requesting me to shut down this thread and
enable her old thread again.

As I stated before, I would enable her old thread if
she will come back with new measurements done without the function generator.


You may want to save this and the other thread as I am pondering to delete all of her
work from this website and ban her.

I am still looking for an easy way to export the threads to PDF files and then make them available
for download. Unfortunately such a function is not build into the Forum software nor is a a plugin / Mod that
do this... So I am looking for a solution to do this.


Please refrain from take a ride of her name or bullshitting her..

Otherwise I might have to block you too.

Please only state facts you can prove yourself and not calling names !

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan. ( admin)

[WilbyInebriated]

You may want to save this and the other thread as I am pondering to delete all of her
work from this website...

do that (deleting threads) and people won't bother to post anything on your site for fear of the same happening to them... this is (one of) the reason(s) i won't post any of my projects here.

I am still looking for an easy way to export the threads to PDF files and then make them available
for download. Unfortunately such a function is not build into the Forum software nor is a a plugin / Mod that
do this... So I am looking for a solution to do this.

look for a library along the lines of 'PHP-PDF' to make PDF's on the fly. it's simple enough to implement it. i'd write you one, but i doubt you would want to pay my fee...

[TinselKoala]

So, let me get this straight. She is allowed to call me a Hitler, a Mussolini, a Savonarola, call me incompetent and ignorant, revile me for all the work I've done, and distort and outright lie about me, what I've said and what I've done. She is allowed to post ridiculous "calculations" and bogus conclusions and refuses to retract them even after they are pointed out to her by many people over and over. And that's allowed, even when she is clearly wrong and her wrongness is confirmed by others, by internet references, and simple common sense.


OK, glad to get the rules straight. Thank you very much. I hope you do preserve these threads, because I know who is right, who is wrong, and what the evidence will support.

I can prove everything I've ever said about her and her claims and her "work", with references, citations, experiment and demonstrations, and her own words.