Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And again Guys, a 'red alert'...

Yes, actually..... you do.


And YOU can prove that you do... by trying to make your negative averages and math trace WITHOUT IT.

TK has referenced this without dates ... YET AGAIN.  I believe what I am here referring to the Parasitic Hartley Effect proposed by a certain academic as an explanation for the oscillation on our COP>17 Test.  I won't swear to to YET - but it is my opinion that this reference of mine has NOTHING to do with this oscillation pertinent to the NERD circuit.

Regards,
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

So. The bottom line is this. We absolutely do not need that oscillation to get the required negative mean average and cycle mean average and negative math trace.

Let's see you do that. I'd love to see it.

But I .... and some others.... know that you cannot, and that this is just another of your hopeful mendacities designed to attract more attention to you and your claims.Tell me, Ainslie: do you work for a living? What do you do to earn your daily bread?
Good grief, I hope you aren't a schoolteacher.That is a frightening thought.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The measurement is not "anomalous". A repeatable, well understood and explained ERROR is not "anomalous" at all.

And I repeat: DO THE MATH on that scope trace. You might find something interesting. Not YOU, Ainslie, because I know you aren't capable of it. But GL, or .99, or MH, or Stefan, or ANYONE can do it... and come to a rather different conclusion than you do.

WHERE HAS ANYONE PROVED THAT IT IS ERRONEOUS?  FAR FROM IT.  If something is measured - repeatedly - then it is NOT an error.  Unless the applied protocols are in error.  And THAT MUCH has not been proved.  You are jumping the gun TK.  As ever.  And your analysis of power related to that little waveform analysis applied to our downloads - is LAUGHABLY inexact.

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

And again Guys, a 'red alert'...
TK has referenced this without dates ... YET AGAIN.  I believe what I am here referring to the Parasitic Hartley Effect proposed by a certain academic as an explanation for the oscillation on our COP>17 Test.  I won't swear to to YET - but it is my opinion that this reference of mine has NOTHING to do with this oscillation pertinent to the NERD circuit.

Regards,
Rosemary

Look at the damn screenshot I posted, you ignorant liar. The date and the place I got it from are on the bottom left corner.

Here's the link, you can see for yourself that you are INDEED talking about your oscillations.
Do you really think that I cannot back up EVERY SINGLE ONE of my allegations with facts and references to YOUR OWN WORDS AND DATA?

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg279347/#msg279347

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Let's see you do that. I'd love to see it.

But I .... and some others.... know that you cannot, and that this is just another of your hopeful mendacities designed to attract more attention to you and your claims.Tell me, Ainslie: do you work for a living? What do you do to earn your daily bread?
Good grief, I hope you aren't a schoolteacher.That is a frightening thought.

I would bother to answer this ALLEGATION for the benefit of our readers if you also took the trouble to quote the context of its reference.  It strikes me as a rather REQUIRED condition to your multiple ALLEGATIONS to keep all context of all references out of reach.  Which is again further proof of your rather reckless desire to distort my statements while you SPIN your SPIN and THROW that HOT TAR.

Rosie Pose