Testing the TK Tar Baby

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

So what in God's name are you saying?  Why are you making a fool of yourself by denigrating other people and their ideas when what you are saying is not true and 95% of the time you are not even qualified to say if their ideas have merit or not?

Why?  What's the real truth with you?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

Why are you repaying my eloquent tribute to your true 'genius' with this parade of insults?  it is NOT appropriate.

It's your 'genius' that deserves the quotations.

You are in the gutter, again.  Your denials a not effective.  Your sleazy little game is out in the open.

How can you look at yourself in the mirror?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Quoting Rosemary:

>>>>

My dear MileHigh,

I LOVE this post - AND THE FOLLOWING.  I shall print them out tomorrow and then frame them and then hang them here by my computer.  And if and when that dim light of your 'real truth' EVER again dares intrude on my waking consciousness then I'll simply re-read these two posts of yours.  Because every re-read will remind me of your nascent comic genius which I initially mistook as an earnest dissertation.

What a boon to science.  A member with the ability to take logic by the nose - twist that nose - and thereby bring pure reason to it's knees.  WHAT a marvelous muddle.

Rosie Pose

LOL by the way (BTW) Guys, - I see now why our little TK depends on MileHigh's support.  He needs that precise scientific mind that MileHigh lacks in copious quantities - to elucidate the argument that TK lacks in any context at all.  It's a match made in heaven.  For my money I'd say that the greater skill is MileHigh's because he can avoid the issue with utter irreverence.  Whereas TK still reaches for some level of plausibility. 

They're a remarkably well matched team.  Two of the Marx Brothers.  But still looking for Groucho to make it perfect.  LOL. I think this is where sean will need to come to their rescue.  He - at least - doesn't underestimate our readers' intelligence.  And he has that caricatured commitment to a really bad mood.

Again.
R
>>>>>>>>>>>

I told you the other night that this garbage ghetto behaviour has to stop.

This kind of low-life mindless idiocy from you shows how truly disgusting your character is at the core.  You mock a serious exploratory discussion about the power flows and the microsecond-level timing of the circuit made in a sincere effort to try to understand what is going on - and make a complete ass of yourself in the process.

You have succeeded in doing nothing more than making a pathetic spectacle of yourself one more time.  Poor Rosie, the "bouncer" of the thread.  If she senses something may affect her proposition, she decides that she is going to feign mockery and 'have a laugh' when in fact there is nothing at all to mock.  Just a pathetic creature.

These disgusting and pathetic displays from you have to stop.

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

@MH: all OK...
I think the integration takes care of the "counting twice" problem. I'm not sure about the correspondence between the simple "mean" and the integral/time thing, though. I'm going to have to think about that one. I know the integration is correct, I don't _know_ that using the simple mean is correct, because of the phase angle and the harmonic content.

And you are right, how the battery behaves depends on the "incoming". I think at 1.5 MHz, though, it might act more like a mirror than a resistor. A lossy mirror...

[MileHigh]

TK:

Even though I am not 'hands on' these days anymore, I still have the 'touch' with equipment.  I am foggy with respect to the nuances of the power discussion right now, I only skimmed through that from a few days ago.

If I had a DSO with math functions I would play with it.  Start with a simple circuit, get familiar with the power calculations, etc.  Then start to push envelope, increase the frequency, try changing parameters, etc.  The desire would be to push the DSO to the point where it "breaks" and you learn its limitations, etc.  You would also want to "force" a negative power reading that you know is false (sound familiar?) and then back off, lower the frequency etc, and observe how the device "recovers."

I suppose it's hypothetical for both of us.  Perhaps one day soon with USB 3.0 there will be some truly decent multi-channel A/D capture modules.  Between the external A/D and your four, six, or eight core processor, you will have a DSO with math and it won't cost $5K.

Honestly, if a dim bulb test was done next week and it was definitive and spelled game over, my interest in the microsecond-level timing of the circuit would wane....

MileHigh