Testing the TK Tar Baby

[fuzzytomcat]

On and On .... Over and Over ....

Rosemary does the same thing ....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W42rMjYWlk

FTC

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@PW, .99:
Here's another "challenge" similar to the Altoid demonstrator idea.
With a single mosfet we know that we can make the continual oscillation mode without difficulty. And it's clear that a single mosfet could be properly pulsed in a clean square wave with an arbitrary duty cycle, coming from an onboard oscillator like a simple 555. And we know that the 5-mosfet circuit can be operated in the bipolar mode with both oscillations and pulses using an external source or even the main battery itself with a charge  pump inverter.

But... is it possible to perform both duties with a single mosfet and the main battery only, using an onboard clock, or even external drive from FG? That is, can one lone mosfet be used to make the oscillations while a gate signal is negative and also make the DC ON when the gate signal is positive, duplicating the performance of the NERD circuit using the bipolar gate drive?

I think this little offering is an attempt at pretending he's capable of any kind of thought at all - let alone associated with science.  What a JOKE. 

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

My dear little TK

I've extrapolated those comments that prove your impeccable professional practices - for the general amusement of our members and readers.

.  WHAT IS THE REFERENCE to this fraud of mine you are alleging, you liar?
.  Just like your laboratory, idiot Little Miss Mosfet,
.  just LIKE YOUR UNNAMED LABORATORY and your phony endorsements
.  You have no grounds to criticise me, you miserable scribbler.
.  You, by claiming prize money based on your bogus claims of overunity and COP INFINITY, are indeed engaging in FRAUD
.  you are trying to profit monetarily from your lies and errors.
.  You have threatened me with physical harm and you are manifestly mentally unstable.
.  I still think you are crazy enough to try to harm me or my property or my family or my employer.
.  My, you are an ignoramus
.  you ignorant person who cannot even operate a calculator correctly,
.  In addition, Ainslie you educationally challenged ignoramus,
.  You are an ignorant, uneducated, arrogant fool
.  Lying hypocrite Ainslie.
.  And that your junk manuscripts contain unsupported claims, distortions, error after error, and outright LIES,
.  Ainslie, lying hypocrite.

... in JUST ONE POST.  LOL 

Guys,

What better proof does anyone need that the man is an arch professional who upholds his oath of professional conduct.  I've said it before.  He's nothing but a silly little man with a HUGE chip on his shoulder.  Like all liars he can't remember what it is that he claimed.  First he's got students and is employed at an academy of sorts.  Then he's got an employer who he's trying to protect.  And a family!  Strange how someone so protective of his own identity is quite so anxious to trash my own.  Notwithstanding all that alleged professionalism. We see the evident of this here.  Preserved for 'posterity' as he puts is.

Regards,
Rosemary

Don't you get it, you lying hypocrite? I can PROVE EVERY THING, every "lying hypocrite" that I call you, Ainslie. You lie over and over, just as you have in that very post, misrepresenting what I've said and what I do. And you show your hypocrisy every time you avoid dealing with an issue about your circuit or your claims, and with every "Dear little TK" and "Regards" you write. Hypocrite. And your ignorance is there for all to see. 5.9 megaJoules ! You are a joke.

Once again, MY professional practices are not at issue. I could be what you allege, I could be a ten year old child or a closet Republican or even a Maori tribeswoman, and you would STILL BE WRONG. I have had to resort to... shall we say... unusual emphasis to counter your outrageous insults... which YOU STARTED, you lying ignorant awful person. But that does not change the facts of the matter: You did not boil anything like a liter of water, you did not dissipate 5.9 megaJoules in 1.6 hours, and you still have not published anything in any scientific journal. You might note that it's been DAYS since anyone has even commented on your "paper" in Rossi's joke blog.

And look again at what I've actually said before you claim that I can't remember. It has been years since I've taught at the University level, and I now have another job, and I have a family and a home, and you are threatening them. What part of those things do YOU not remember? You lie again, you lying hypocrite, when you imply and assert that I have been anything but truthful and consistent. Let's see you give a reference to anything I've said that you can prove is untrue. You cannot do it. I on the other hand have so many things YOU have said that are later shown to be untrue that it's hard to choose. The present one about the 5.9 megaJoules, and the "boiling water" should be sufficient to PROVE that YOU ARE A LIAR, for the present purposes.

[TinselKoala]

I think this little offering is an attempt at pretending he's capable of any kind of thought at all - let alone associated with science.  What a JOKE. 

Rosie Pose

No, Ainslie, you idiot bloviating troll. It is another attempt to check on a claim that YOU have made and that I doubt. You have told people that a single mosfet is all that is needed. I doubt this. I don't think you can make both oscillations AND high load heat using a single mosfet in the way that you are claiming, and so I am trying to FIND OUT something that I don't know yet. THIS IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: one posits an hypothesis and then tries WITH ALL ONE'S MIGHT to DISPROVE, not prove, it. If I fail to DISPROVE my idea then I know that it might just barely be right. YOU have never tried to DISPROVE your "thesis", only to "prove" it, and you continue to fail miserably.

Now, if you aren't going to deal with the real issues concerning your claims and your error-laden manuscripts, I suggest you go away and try to get some sleep. Or just go away, lie to some other people for a while, we are getting tired of you.

[picowatt]

@PW, .99:
Here's another "challenge" similar to the Altoid demonstrator idea.
With a single mosfet we know that we can make the continual oscillation mode without difficulty. And it's clear that a single mosfet could be properly pulsed in a clean square wave with an arbitrary duty cycle, coming from an onboard oscillator like a simple 555. And we know that the 5-mosfet circuit can be operated in the bipolar mode with both oscillations and pulses using an external source or even the main battery itself with a charge  pump inverter.

But... is it possible to perform both duties with a single mosfet and the main battery only, using an onboard clock, or even external drive from FG? That is, can one lone mosfet be used to make the oscillations while a gate signal is negative and also make the DC ON when the gate signal is positive, duplicating the performance of the NERD circuit using the bipolar gate drive?

TK,

Do you want to do this with the common gate NERD type circuit or the .99/TK/Altoid type oscillator?

PW