Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 159 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Sorry about this guys,

He hasn't got the bigness of soul required to admit an error. 
Quote from: picowatt on June 24, 2012, 03:39:25 AM
Once again, you do not know what you are talking about.  TK and I were discussing a new coil driver of Groudloop's design that TK is building/working on.

And yes, THERE IS somethng wrong with Q1 in the tests depicted by FIG 3 and FIG 7 in YOUR first paper.

During the portion of the cycle wherein the FG output is a positive voltage, +12 volts is indicated as gate drive to Q1, which should turn Q1 fully on.  The CSR trace does not indicate the current flow one would expect if Q1 is turned on.

So, Q1 is either defective or is not connected as per the schematic provided in that paper.  There can be no other explanation.

Plain and simple.
Since he's not going to back down then I will.  I"ll spare you my replies - and let him bore you all to tears as he pretends that he's got a leg to stand on.  It's why he sits in that armchair.  He is not capable of being upright.

Regards again,
Rosemary

Magluvin

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 24, 2012, 02:51:53 AM
Hello Mags,
I'm intrigued with your contributions to this thread.  It seems you're needed when TK's credibility is being questioned.  Is that your mandate?  The role you play? I've always wondered about your part in all this.  It's not as if you're replicating.  And frankly I resent your earlier statement where you advised TK that he needed to be 'tough' on me?   But I must admit you're using a spell check of late and your grammar is much improved.  Well done.  If I didn't know better I would detect more than one player uses your name.  Surely not?

Regards,
Rosie

Hmm.  No Rose, spell check doesnt work here at OU. Not since the new software change. Others have the same issue. There is a thread on it here.  I just used my brain. But thanks for the complement.  ??? I deserve that I suppose. ::)

All I did was state some facts on Mylow that are fairly well known. By most here. It was a pretty big thing at the time. Many were involved. And it wasnt just a few days.

Would you rather not know? And keep on saying what you think you know?  ;)   I was there. I was involved with TK on the issue for a bit. And it wasnt always just about Mylow scamming. Tk did experiments on how when a magnet slides down an aluminum plate on a slope, N pole down has a slightly different effect that S pole down. I have a fare memory.

I would like to see the post that I encouraged TK to be "tough" on you. Using that very word. I would be very interested in seeing that.  ;) If anything, I have defended you with a vengeance in the past.

If I have had peaceful conversation with TK on his recent circuits and vids, mostly it was questions. Like how did he get both leds to light, when before they were not.
I was interested. Should I have said, " Whats up with those leds lighting up now ya snake in the Texas grass cranky ole bastard wizard you?  And he might have answered, "Well ya bloviated crosseyed cat weasel crappin all over my thread, zippon exuding flunky, ......"   But it didnt go that way.

This is because I never really hate anyone. But there is a time to be stern and forthright, and there is a time to be peaceful and civil.  There is a time to help someone out if in need. And there are times to correct the person being helped.

Think of me how you wish. I have never asked anything of you. Just helped, untill you made it a point that my comments were not needed a while back. But maybe you dont remember that. I do.


Mags



picowatt

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 24, 2012, 03:43:23 AM
Sorry about this guys,

He hasn't got the bigness of soul required to admit an error.  Since he's not going to back down then I will.  I"ll spare you my replies - and let him bore you all to tears as he pretends that he's got a leg to stand on.  It's why he sits in that armchair.  He is not capable of being upright.

Regards again,
Rosemary

Then prove me wrong.  Show some spine and Fax away to LeCroy.

Can't wait till you explain this to your new readers, maybe they won't know how to read a 'scope, but then, maybe they will.

Good luck with that AC/DC coupling thing, if you only knew how silly that was.


Rosemary Ainslie

Here's your post Mags.

Quote from: Magluvin on June 21, 2012, 02:09:11 AM
I dont agree with Roses threats of identity disclosure of PW, or anyone. But you should know by now that this is an idle threat.
Like, do you know if she even has that info for sure? Does PW give out his identity casually? Bad idea. I havnt really seen that PW has any enemies here. And I dont think Rose is a limb shipper. ;]
picowatt has deliberately attempted to diminish our claim through the use of utterly spurious argument and you say I have no CAUSE?  How would you like it if 10 years of hard work was then disparaged through the abysmal use of fallacious argument?  That I could consider him a friend?

Quote from: Magluvin on June 21, 2012, 02:09:11 AMThis here, for you guys, is to prove that Rose is not being truthful, and or exaggerating claims. Yet your post is an exaggeration also. So should you get a beat down for doing the same?
And here you are endorsing their own contention that we've exaggerated our claims?  You say as much.  'This ... is to prove that Rose is not being truthful?  ... 'or exaggerating claims'?  Exactly WHERE?  You've effectively joined their band wagon to claim that we lie.  We do NOT lie.  We can't.  We're dealing with measurement and data.  What they're trying to spin is that the data is erroneous.  And what you're doing is buying into their spin.

And here it is...
Quote from: Magluvin on June 21, 2012, 02:09:11 AM
I know you are trying to be hard on Rose with your convictions.
'hard on Rose'?  WHAT?  Hundreds of pages and thousands of allegations that I'm lunatic, stupid, unschooled, old, mendacious, fraudulent, deluded - and you say that  they're 'TRYING to be hard'?  That's got to be the choicest use of understatement that I've ever been exposed to.

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

Guys, this is when I seethe with anger...

Quote from: picowatt on June 24, 2012, 03:48:16 AM

Good luck with that AC/DC coupling thing, if you only knew how silly that was.

The function generator does not give us a purely DC VOLTAGE.  Picowatt knows this.  He also knows that the most of you don't.  Therefore he's on relatively safe ground when he denies it.  He's utterly despicable. 

Regards,
Rosemary