Testing the TK Tar Baby

[WilbyInebriated]

Ainslie's circuit is INefficient because its capacitances and inductances are not tuned.

Actually, Wilby, you calorimetrically challenged energy consumer you, Ainslie's circuit is 100 percent efficient.

so which is it you idiot troll? is it inefficient or is it 100% efficient? make up your mind.

When MY circuit is operating in clean ClassE mode, the mosfet stays cool, even though it's carrying six amps.

your circuit? ahh there's that narcissism you're famous for. isn't it basically (other than the clipleads and white pegboard) rose's circuit? tuned to load match your tesla coil...  of course it is and of course it stays cool... it's got a monster heat sink on it.

[TinselKoala]

so which is it you idiot troll? is it inefficient or is it 100% efficient? make up your mind.

When will you stop beating your dog, Wilby? Answer the question.

In other words, strawman constructor, you know very well what is meant by efficiency. One has a target, a purpose for any circuit. Heat in the load, RF radiation, etc. Heat in the mosfets on huge heatsinks, LIKE AINSLIE HAS, is usually considered waste heat and is subtracted from stated efficiency levels. But of course, energy out always equals energy in, except in Rosemary-world and some other fantasy lands, so we expect, UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE, any circuit to behave this way: in other words, COUNTING ALL OUTPUTS and ALL INPUTS, every circuit is expected to be 100 percent efficient.
Put that in your strawman's corncob pipe and wipe your windows with it.

your circuit? ahh there's that narcissism you're famous for. isn't it basically (other than the clipleads and white pegboard) rose's circuit? tuned to load match your tesla coil...  of course it is and of course it stays cool... it's got a monster heat sink on it.

My circuit. I built it, I made component substitutions based on my knowledge, and it's sitting here on my workbench right now. If you don't think that makes it MY circuit... .then you must also agree that Ainslie's single mosfet circuit is not hers also, since it or something very like it appears in every IRFPG50 data sheet in the world as the inductive clamp test circuit. And as Mags has shown, something very like the present  multimosfetmess is a simple flipflop oscillator.

Now.... you, I think, are simply jealous and playing "sour grapes", because you have nothing at all to show for yourself after all these years, having lost your thumbs in a sailing accident trimming your jib to the wind.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Your description of your circuit, its components, the equipment used, has many holes in it. Not just 1 or 3 or 10!!!!    I see this now. Its all there to see.

Mags

Hi Magsy,

Please be specific.  WHERE are those 'holes' as you describe them? 

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My circuit. I built it, I made component substitutions based on my knowledge, and it's sitting here on my workbench right now. If you don't think that makes it MY circuit... .then you must also agree that Ainslie's single mosfet circuit is not hers also, since it or something very like it appears in every IRFPG50 data sheet in the world as the inductive clamp test circuit.

Quite right little TK.  It most certainly is NOT my circuit.  Nor is it yours.  It's very well known technology.  It's also HIGHLY efficient - provided only you take the trouble to MEASURE that efficiency. 

And as Mags has shown, something very like the present  multimosfetmess is a simple flipflop oscillator.

Not actually little TK.  They're nothing alike - not in their MEASURED results.

Regards as ever, and notwithstanding
Rosie Pose

added 'little'

[TinselKoala]

Little Miss Mosfet, you wouldn't know a proper measurement if you woke up next to one.

For example how did you make the measurement that gave you the figure of 5.9 megaJoules, as you state in your official publication on Rossi's JNP? You know, the one you lied about retracting. ENLARGE YOUR SCREEN and read what is up RIGHT NOW on Rossi's "Journal" under YOUR NAME, Ainslie.