Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

And here's another showing the drains. Again, it's the green trace. Note however that in this trial there is NO positive gate voltage, the gate drive goes from zero down. So the Q1 is not being turned on, no current flows as is proper. During the Q2 oscillation times, the drain trace oscillates as do all the other traces. But this shot is also "wrong" because it shows the drain AC coupled.

TK,

Looks like channel 4 is AC coupled in this capture.

PW

ADDED: I guess I should read further!  When I see a schematic or capture, I tend to look only at those!  Yep, we agree, channel 4 is AC coupled!

But this also demonstrates why I was not too excited one way or another about more captures being released.  They are pretty much meaningless without accompanying lab notes giving the schematic and equip settings and the purpose of the test.

I have quile literally more than 14,000 captures stored in my bench laptop.  They would be all but meaningless to anyone without the notes that go along with each test regarding what variables were changed, what is being investigated, etc.

[TinselKoala]

MOSFETs... HOW do they work, anyway?

Part 5, in which I control the rate of charge removal from the mosfet gate to produce a simple "timer".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3teBThPE_c

Stay tuned for Part 6, where we take a field trip to my outside Earth ground rod, bringing along the trusty Interstate F43, to illustrate PW's point that ground potential is _ground potential_, with the entire EARTH as the capacitive reservoir behind it, and we are NOT going to be changing that potential by any means available to us.
(Most of us, anyway.)

[fuzzytomcat]

Rosemary I note all my referenced links in my postings .... your just to damn stupid to actually read a posting let alone comment properly.

Howdy all,

If your not confused yet on Rosemary's understanding of her COP>INFINITY device(s) operation on mosfets Q1 and Q2 ..... well 

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2012/01/232-another-summation-based-on.html#links

Rosemary's BlogSpot Quote #232 - "another summation based on countering the counter arguments"
FTC

Hi Guys,

Just be advised that Glen, like TK - ALWAYS gives insubstantial reference.  It's required for that 'spin'.  If you want an idea of what was ACTUALLY discussed then you'll need to check in on this link.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2012/01/232-another-summation-based-on.html

This is yet another example of thousands of your misrepresentation and misleading of facts. The fact is all your COP>INFINITY claims have no referenced links for the data because "YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND" and refuse to post the required for proof of operation .....

Rosemary's slimy slug trail goes on and on ...

Hello again Little TK,

She may have provided the data... to somebody, at some time. But it's certain that the spreadsheets are not available for public inspection.
The present refusal to provide the data to MrSean2k is just the first _overt_ refusal. She's promised to provide them several times in the past to other people, including Stefan Hartmann, and has simply "let it slide" without further mention or explanation.

Not actually.  Your own efforts at so called 'documentation' of my work is all the proof that's needed that you guys can spin data any way you choose.  No need to refer to facts.  I didn't let my offer to Stefan lapse. I simply changed my mind.  His preferred editorial bias was beginning to bother me.

Keeping them secret, not providing them when asked for.... is a no-no. The first thing a reviewer might do... after checking the basic math and the references... would be to ask for the original data, and if the researcher can't produce them for some reason, out the window the manuscript goes.

Again.  Not actually.  It seems that all that's needed is the apparatus or close inspection of the apparatus to enable replications.  Unlike you the genuine researcher doesn't first rampage through public threads with overly abundant evidence of calumny and malice - before he asks for more evidence.  Such bad manners does not, usually, generate an atmosphere of trust and cooperation.

Which reminds me.  I need to repost a post of mine - lest the public think for one minute that you're in a position to comment on anything at all.

Rosie Pose

As everyone can see the selective response to TK's posting leaving out the paragraph .....

But the excuse currently given is clearly bogus. I mean, Ainslie possesses the originals, right? And a copy could be filed with a notary and kept under seal, so that if any evil debunkers tried to, say..... SELECT DATA THAT ONLY SUPPORTED THEIR HYPOTHESES.... or tried to ALTER OR EDIT OR COVER UP DATA OR IMAGES.... the certified copy could be compared and the perpetrators busted. So it's easy to assure both the integrity of the data sets released and their careful and unbiased examination.... by releasing them.

The response from Rosemary isn't a excuse but a open admission of purposively committing a fraud on the "open source community" with inaccurate and misleading statements, cobbled published testing and evaluation information to get experimentalist to do her work. The slimeball quote of Rosemary's that "I changed my mind" has always been and is not exceptionable when exploiting and manipulating help from forum members asking for help in replications to be made for conformation or verification of her said performance claim(s).

Rosemary's open admission of purposively committing a fraud and by actions has no boundaries with her, from all the lies on experts, authors, documentation to the YouTube Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc

The protections Rosemary has put in place at her lousy pathetic self promoting forum hasn't brought one so called COP>INFINITY device author or collaborator to post any comments .... why ? It's because they don't in reality exist but only in Rosemary's sick perverted mind.

FTC

Where is your response to this post directly above ? 

You cant even discuss or post comments in context you idiot always misrepresenting or misleading the conversation, cherry picking your responses, splitting your reply postings up sentence by sentence or even word by word to cloud up your fraudulent devices murky water with a smoke screen of deception and delusions.

Rosemary your words are nothing but a rubbish can full of your favorite slug scum, you self proclaimed super troll in high heals, your such a low life that you give your friends the same favors as everyone else of snake oil, grub worms and buffalo chips so possibly people will listen and believe you. We're all really sick and tired of your normal personal diet of food staples I just listed that your always trying to feed us all everyday.

You are a nothing but a toothless super troll giving fake information on devices you created that are "FRAUDULENT" having "NO" proof of their operation other than some cherry picked data specifically for your stupid THESIS.

FTC

[poynt99]

Part 2.

Here we have a look at things when the FG Output stage is connected to the NERD circuit.

The circuit is drawn exactly as per the ROSSI paper 1, and the FG is connected precisely the same.

Think about what happens to Q1 and Q2 when the FG positive output terminal (RED) is +10V, and when it is -10V (with respect to the negative terminal, black).

[picowatt]

Part 2.

Here we have a look at things when the FG Output stage is connected to the NERD circuit.

The circuit is drawn exactly as per the ROSSI paper 1, and the FG is connected precisely the same.

Think about what happens to Q1 and Q2 when the FG positive output terminal (RED) is +10V, and when it is -10V (with respect to the negative terminal, black).

.99,

Excellent depiction of the FG as utilized in this circuit!

Your time and effort greatly appreciated...

PW