Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

TK,

What?? No separate on/off time RC's in there?

Well, I wanted to make changes in steps, so I used the same charging resistor as the manual version did, for a quick charge up. But I did mention that the charging time could be regulated as well in the "description" to the video. I think I have another little trimpot I can put on the charging side.

I am going to have that stuck in my head the rest of the day...click, click, click, click, click...

Personally, I think your proposed ground rod demo was going a bit over the top with it all.

PW

Over the top and to the moon. I like the idea of nailing one end of the FG to the ground and letting the other end flap in the breeze. But of course it will fall on deaf ears and blind eyes of the willfully ignorant. Someone is watching, though .... These videos are getting several views before I even post the links to them.

And, just in passing, I have once again implemented yet another way of controlling pulsations and duty cycle of the TarBaby/NERD circuit that can be adapted to make the negative oscillations as well as the positive Q1 turn-ons (using a DPDT relay or other means), and... if one is as perceptive as Mags is... one can see that Ainslie's feedback oscillations are caused by the very same mechanism as what I've illustrated here, just happening a lot faster, with the stray inductances and the natural system capacitances playing the role of the relay and the extra trimpot and capacitor.

At least, I hope that the linear operation of the mosfet is now well - understood... click, click.... since it can be observed with every capacitor discharge, the light fading as the gate charge drains away and the gate field gradually closes the drain-source valve ... click, click......

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilby, when people refuse to pay you in cash or barter with you to be a code monkey, do you resort to dumpster diving?  lol

more logical fallacies from milelow... imagine that! 

i like how you keep trying to drag this thread off topic whenever poynty tries to bring it back to topic...

[TinselKoala]

I see she is still havig difficulties reading a schematic of her own circuit, as per her response to .99.

And yet she actually must somehow believe herself qualified to discuss, rather, argue, the circuit's operation.

Sad really...

Sure. Look at this cartoon figure from the "paper 2" manuscript on Rossi's JNP. This is where she "explains" what is happening during the oscillations. Note where she has the Q1 and Q2 G, D, and S labels. This does not appear to correspond to ANY of the circuit schematics shown in any of the papers, but perhaps it does to the scribbled diagram "taking liberties" that we posted earlier.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Sorry Guys.  I meant to post a link.     Here it is
As this is still very topical I'm re-posting this...

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2012/02/261-much-needed.html

Regards,
Rosemary

[fuzzytomcat]

Sorry Guys.  I meant to post a link.     Here it is
As this is still very topical I'm re-posting this...

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2012/02/261-much-needed.html

Regards,
Rosemary

YEP .... more topical BULL CRAP !!

OH .... LOOK AT THE DATE .... 

POST SOME LINKS TO ANY OF YOUR COP>INFINITY TEST DATA ROSEMARY .... SCHEMATIC USED, SCOPE SHOTS, DATA DUMPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS FOR A COMPLETE TEST, NOT JUST ONE CHERRY PICKED SCOPE SHOT WITH A MATH FUNCTION AS ALWAYS SHOWN FOR A COMPLETE EVALUATED TEST BY ONLY YOU AND NO ONE ELSE.