Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

HERE'S YOUR CLAIM...

I have posted the most significant and exciting thing that I personally have EVER SEEN on this forum: the portable wireless power transmitting system, which offers a lot of opportunity for education, fun, and yes... even understanding some of the principles that I see being fractured daily on various threads in this forum.  More than any other device that I've seen proposed or shown here or in just about any other "free energy" site, the transmission of power through space using induction as in the Black Briefcase or by capacitance as in the SassyClassE sstc offers TRUE OPPORTUNITIES to link up with that Wheelwork of Nature that Nikola Tesla talked about.

[TinselKoala]

Good.  Now we know that there's nothing of interest in your toy.

That's right. That must be why I am deluged with PMs and YT comments from people trying to buy it from me. In fact, the unit I showed in the last set of pictures is being sent out to its new owner... PROUD owner... on Monday.

Nothing of interest here, just move along, keep moving, don't notice what's happening, don't notice that AINSLIE HAS HER APPARATUS BACK but STILL ISN'T DOING ANYTHING WITH IT, don't notice that successful measurable useful POWER is being extracted FROM THE THIN AIR right before your eyes by the receiver section, to turn a MOTOR or light up a brilliant light, or both ....

[Rosemary Ainslie]

NOT ONLY DID YOU NOT INCLUDE IT IN YOUR CALCULATIONS - YOU ALSO ACKNOWLEDGED THE OMISSION.

YOU ARE A BALDFACED LIAR AND THE PUBLIC RECORD PROVES IT. YOU CONTINUE TO LIE EVEN WHEN PRESENTED WITH EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE LYING. This means that you are a pathological liar.... therefore you have a mental illness, right out in front of God and everybody.

WHERE is your spreadsheet showing YOUR calculations? Or rather those of the person who DID YOUR WORK FOR YOU.

NOW.  You hide behind an internet identity.  You trash my name which is NOT HIDDEN.  I have CAUSE to defend my good name.  You have advised everyone that I am MAD.  SHOW THAT PROOF.

R

[TinselKoala]

HERE'S YOUR CLAIM...

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO COMPARE CLAIMS?

OK, HERE IS YOUR CLAIM:

NOW.  Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands.  We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception.  Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged.  We've had those batteries since January 2010.  We've been running them since August 2010.  I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities.  They're 40 ampere hours each.  We've used 6 of them continually since that time.  According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries.  That gives a work potential - a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules per second x 90 minutes of the test period = 22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes = 3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 = 25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is 10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.  And that was just one test.  Now.  Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive.  Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH.  They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED.

[TinselKoala]

NOT ONLY DID YOU NOT INCLUDE IT IN YOUR CALCULATIONS - YOU ALSO ACKNOWLEDGED THE OMISSION.

NOW.  You hide behind an internet identity.  You trash my name which is NOT HIDDEN.  I have CAUSE to defend my good name.  You have advised everyone that I am MAD.  SHOW THAT PROOF.

R

You are doing a fine job of showing the proof right now yourself, Ainslie. Since when did you need MY help for anything?

Look at the date of my spreadsheet. Look at the calculations therein.

WHERE IS YOUR SPREADSHEET, that you promised to release MANY TIMES?