Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

@Mags.... I can tell you have never experienced a "water hammer". Of course hydraulic systems in pipes can oscillate, even destructively... and even usefully. But you are right, other things like diaphragms and pistons and reservoirs of springy compressed air help a lot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIFVGq3RFRE

Air pressure is involved too of course.

[TinselKoala]

Anyways, I gota read the rest of the thread after I eat to see what the next challenge is.

The challenge is the same as it's always been: to try to flush out the "bad air" that prevents one... someone... from breathing in the fresh air of truth, in order that enlightenment can occur.

I am in no way trying to give some kind of comprehensive course in QED or electrical parameters. I am, rather, trying to instil a firm grounding in some very basic fundamentals that I feel are lacking, and which lack is producing this incredible block to further understanding and progress.  I feel that replacing the incorrect model that is guiding one's perceptions with a more precisely defined and operational model... along with _real_ meditation upon the koan, both Zen and electrical... and especially video.... that I have presented, is actually necessary for progress. This understanding might be attainable by different means; here I choose to be explicit about what I feel is misunderstood and is essential for proper understanding: charge and its characteristics.

In reality, I see electric charge, and electron flow as compressible, like air or gas.

Yes, and I've tried to make that point as well. The choice of fluid is less important than the concepts analogised. For some purposes a compressible fluid works best and for others an incompressible fluid works. Sometimes it's easier to think of the "pressure" as being applied by the walls of the container... and sometimes as being applied by the fluid TO the walls of the container.

Regardless of all that, let's just try to focus on the fundamentals: charge is fundamental, charge is conserved, charge is quantized, and so on. Like charge repels like, electrons are the inseparable carriers of the unit negative charge, current is the flow of negative charge. When you accept the fundamentals, you can derive all the other behaviours and consequences therefrom.

I've posted two video koan. They are relevant to the issue of capacitors and capacitance and electrical fields and forces. They are also difficult to model either hydraulically or pneumatically, since the _field_ is involved. I sincerely hope that everyone has watched and contemplated them: the perpetual pingpong ball and the oil jet demo. I will be discussing them anon.

Charge, motion, field: One thing, one.

[TinselKoala]

The two previous video koan are showing "electrostatic" phenomena, and in addition both provide yet more empirical evidence of the kind that MrSean2k asked for.

Electrostatics is the branch of electronics that deals with high, sometimes very high indeed, voltages, and very low, often essentially zero, currents. The voltages are so high that the electric field from charged objects extends to palpable distances in space and exerts very strong forces--- much much stronger than gravity, for example.

In the following video, the entire Earth is pulling against that pingpong ball with its gravity, and the electrostatic force of a tiny fraction of a Coulomb of charge is able to pull it away against gravity entirely. The voltages involved are so very high that the tens of megohms of my body's resistance are as nothing, and the tiny current involved flows through me as if I were a pure conductor of truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX-jrlGC-aA

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Posted from Energy and Shifting Paradigms.com.

And Guys, as this thread is to do with 'troll spin' - let me put record to something that weighs heavy on the mind.  We have relied heavily on the assumption that open sourcing information is 'the way to go' - in order to spread the word about the evidence that energy is not constrained to standard assumptions.  The proof is that we can measure something that defies anything possible within the constraints of Kirchhoff's unity requirements or in terms of our known thermodynamic laws.  However, I have now been rather exposed to the attendant dangers of this process.   Which constitutes a gross breach of that rather noble reach.  Indeed I am concerned that there is any value at all in this approach.  And yet, without it - I cannot see how we can spread the word.  And the value of open sourcing this knowledge is to prove that we do not need our traditional energy supply monopolists.  Energy - from our evidence - is freely available and simply requires development to application.  And this, in turn, threatens the interests of those monopolists who rely on those early assumptions related to our unity requirements.  Rather than rehash the multiple bases those objections let me list what we intend doing when I get back here from my operation - and as ever, God willing.  For the record - there has been no let up of the abuse against this work of ours and against my good name for the entire time that I have attempted to bring these facts to the table.  The latest and most disgusting of them all is courtesy our internet personality known as TinselKoala - who has engaged in a level of public criticism and humiliation that is both inhumane in its delivery and psychopathic in its self interest.  On both fronts their behaviour has been legally actionable and morally unacceptable.

- We will do live internet broadcasts of tests run and filmed in real time
- We will show two systems drawing down the same amount of energy from a battery supply
- The one will be a standard series application of a load
- The others will be variants of our circuit
- We guarantee that you will see the control deplete its energy before the test has even discharged a small fraction of a volt

Which will constitute unequivocal proof of our claim.  The good news is this.  You will, most assuredly, be shown the evidence in real time.  All our tests will be more comprehensive than described in the above points.  Reasonable comparisons will be made as to the energy being dissipated at the loads in both the test and the controls. Any arguments as to any extraneous energy being introduced - will be addressed.  And the data from that process will be available in whatever format is required and will be forwarded to select and trusted laboratories for their inspection.

Because these draw down tests are extensive - by their nature - then the tests themselves will probably extend over some considerable period of time.  But I anticipate that this will be a good thing. As it will give our readers time to engage fully.  During this process I intend to also make smaller videos to address sundry claims that have been voiced with a sorry lack of decency and constraint - and with considerably less scientific justification than is merited. 

When this process is completed I intend engaging all those internet personalities who have taken the trouble to slander and malign my good name - and to misrepresent this hard work - and I will require a retraction of their claims and a public apology.  Failing which I will take legal action against them.  That is my promise.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And for those of you who are following TK's absurd rendition of the 'classical approach' - may I caution you.  This is NOT even a reasonable rendition of QED concepts.  It appears to be the eccentric machinations of TK's own delusions.  Further - this nonsense which is an apology of an explanation - at best - is intended rather laughable as it is - to defend the fact that unity cannot be breached.

He ERRS.  HOPELESSLY.

If you wish to be informed as to the actual confusions related to the standard model - here's a link...
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2322.msg2593.html#msg2593

Regards,
Rosemary
edited spelling