Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Now.... does he mean that it took 3 hours for his insulated load cell to increase the temperature of 175 mL of water by 14.4 degrees C?

It takes (14.4 degrees x 175 mL) = 2520 Joules to heat that water that much. 3 hours is 10800 seconds, and a Watt is a Joule per Second, so the average power needed simply to heat the water is 2520 Joules PER 10800 seconds, or 2520/10800 = about a quarter of a Watt average, over the entire period.  (or 0.233333333..... Watt if you prefer.)

The circuit, according to gmeast's measurements, took 0.43885 Watt to do it ( measured to the hundredth of a milliWatt how? ), for a heating efficiency of 0.23333/0.43885 or a little over 50 percent. Most of the losses probably occur in the  mosfet itself, and through the insulation of the load cell.

Where did gmeast's " .9766867Watt to do that" (sic) number come from, can anyone tell me? Is this a calibrated measurement?

Magluvin

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 29, 2012, 01:05:12 AM

0.23333/0.43885 or a little over 50 percent.

Where did gmeast's " .9766867Watt to do that" (sic) number come from, can anyone tell me? Is this a calibrated measurement?

Looks like GM knows how to use a calculator. ;]

MaGs

mrsean2k

The only way I can see that figure being in some way correct, is if 0.97-blah-blah is the calculated instantaneous power during the on phase of his duty cycle, making his duty cycle ~25%. That would let him arrive at the correct total energy required for that increase in temp.? Very hard to tell from the phrasing used.


TinselKoala

Can't you be more specific, .99? Just where, exactly, is Ainslie wrong?

???


And three months of careful and patient explanation, poynt by carefully argued poynt, are gone ... like tears in rain.