Testing the TK Tar Baby

[poynt99]

Which reminds me... how is Gmeast measuring "across the load"? Is he considering Drain-to-Negative Rail to be "across the load"? Or does he have isolated probe references so he can actually measure across the load while also monitoring the main CVR on the neg rail? Or does he have enough channels available to use two probes in a differential manner for the "across the load" measurement?

Greg thinks he is computing the input power (Pin) correctly, but he is not. For some odd unknown reason, he thinks that he should be multiplying the battery voltage by the duty cycle factor, when of course this is utterly incorrect.

As far as I know, he isn't attempting to measure the voltage across the load for any reason. Is he?

[poynt99]

Just a quick note to acknowledge PW and his excellent advice about using a 1 Ohm CSR vs. using a 0.25 or 0.1 Ohm CSR.

Two benefits:

1) It provides for a better signal to noise ratio and uses more bits of those 8-bit oscilloscopes, which is going to improve the measurement accuracy.

2) It reduces the Q of the CSR resistor, provided it is not a wire-wound CSR. Assuming the inductance is relatively unchanged among different values of CSR's this increases the resistance to inductance ratio and therefore the accuracy of the current being measured via the CSR.

One possible detriment is the introduction of 1 Ohm of resistance in the circuit, but most times this is innocuous.

[fuzzytomcat]

@ gmeast,

Well I can see now you didn't research shit when it came to Rosemary's claimed Quantum COP>17 circuit ..... nothing ..... na da ...... and you call everyone else a idiot ?? Your a fool !!!! 

FTC

[poynt99]

Thanks Glen. 

Actually, I posted the same pic over there in response to Greg's accusation.

ETA: Greg has now deleted my recent posts in his thread. I copied the example to my FG thread there.

[poynt99]

Greg has had another fit:

Hi Rosie,

Sorry, but I'm done here.  This poyn99t a_ _hole has ruined this for me.  Remove my moderator privileges and just ban me so I'm not tempted to post here again.  I've decided to NOT share any findings with anyone.

Thanks for the opportunity, but it's not worth putting in the hours and enthusiasm and then having to put up with a self righteous a _ _ wipe like poynt99.

So Rose will no doubt ban me; this time on purpose as opposed to by mistake. Greg's threatening to leave, and once Rose calms him down, he'll agree to stay and Rose will ban me...again. LOL 

Greg specifically asked to see what I have built and tested in regards to Rose's circuit, so I obliged him and posted that pic of my setup from 2009. He deleted that too.

Evidently, Greg is afraid of something.