Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

 

[TinselKoala]

I wonder if I can use GMeast's technique to analyze the power in and out of this device.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0SfDwyM7Kk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11cBBjjd2qA

[TinselKoala]

No comments? Heck, I have oscillations, a negative mean power product, high voltage output, can charge batteries and capacitors, light up incandescent bulbs brighter than with equivalent DC power...... I guess there's no excitement, because I'm not claiming "free energy" or overunity performance.

By the way, did I mention that our boffins, to the man, have endorsed my measurements? I also have test results from FGH, CBPP Inc. and DeLaCroix themselves that my device works just as I show.

Meanwhile.... yet more delays from Ainslie, who promised months ago to post her videos refuting my several points, but of course will not do so. There will be NO TESTING and NO VIDEOS forthcoming from Ainslie, never fear. She won't even post a video to PROVE ME WRONG.... because she cannot.

Meanwhile, let's not forget that Tar Baby can do, and HAS DONE, every single thing that Ainslie claims that her NERD circuit can do.... and just like her NERD circuit, the batteries DO run down and do so in a perfectly normal manner. Not only that, but I have an analogous circuit that runs on CAPACITORS ONLY and makes the same negative mean power result, thanks to .99. I also have many other circuits using switched mosfets and bipolar transistors that do much more amazing and interesting stuff than the NERD circuit does.

What exactly IS the NERD circuit, anyway? Out of all the copies of the several "papers" that Ainslie has scattered around the internet, it's hard to find an agreement. And after the history of the Ainslie affair is considered.... is anyone going to believe anything but ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPHS of both sides of her experimental board, since she herself manifestly does NOT EVEN KNOW HOW to read a schematic? I know I certainly won't.

Meanwhile we already know that Ainslie has no qualms about claiming to use one schematic circuit when she's actually using another completely different one, as she did from the date of her earlier video in March of last year, all the way through April when .99 finally analyzed the photos and posted the ACTUAL circuit that she used. Nearly a month of lies, over 400 forum posts discussing the WRONG circuit, because either she was so incompetent that she really didn't know, or she is so mendacious and prevaricating that she tried deliberately to cover up and mislead her replicators.

Hey, NERDS.... why don't you show a circuit that is running on a battery that IT CHARGED ITSELF..... like I can do, and have done, and will do again. Let me answer for you: because you cannot.

[gmeast]

Depressing news. Gmeast has discovered that his battery-powered free energy device is powered by... the batteries. And, sadly, it only runs as long as the batteries are charged. And the batteries run down; they don't stay charged or increase their state of charge like they are supposed to. But they heat a resistor! A few tenths of a degree hotter than DC calculated power !!
At least, until they run down.

Do you think we will see a simple Dim Bulb test from GMeast? I don't.

You guys can't even do a good job of attempting to discredit someone.  If you use 1 watt of electrical power to supply a circuit that produces 1.5 watts (equivalent) of heat, then it's a winner.  The excess power doesn't have to come in the form of electrical components at all.  Trying to "close the loop" with a matching type of power is probably impossible in a legitimate system.


So, this thread is the height of social acceptance for you guys.  As I had said before, you are all like a bunch of 5th graders exhibiting nothing more than a 'feeding frenzy, pack mentality'.  I'll have the last laugh.

[poynt99]

I'll have the last laugh.