Testing the TK Tar Baby

[MileHigh]

I read the latest two Rosie rants.  It's possible that she has Borderline Personality Disorder.  Look it up, I am obviously not qualified to pass judgement.  Think about the relentless attack on Harvey as an example and the ups and downs and the idolizing and the demonizing.

[fuzzytomcat]

Who let that smelly frankfurter dog in .... It crapped all over this room again. What the hell is that thing eating, rotten eggs and pickles. 

[ramset]

Have a sniff over here...

No battery, No Cap,  No power source

Runs a load ..........

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4864-donald-smith-devices-too-good-true-258.html#post213894

Thx
Chet

[TinselKoala]

Yousaidwhatever...... there is nothing in your posts that is anything but spam.

AINSLIE CANNOT REFUTE ANY of my experimentation.

AINSLIE CANNOT SUPPORT HER CONTENTION that I am "Bryan Little" (or Brian).

AINSLIE CANNOT CORRECT her bogus manuscripts because they are terminally flawed.

AINSLIE CANNOT REFUTE ANY OF MY CRITICISMS OF HER DAFT MANUSCRIPTS.

AINSLIE CANNOT SUPPORT ANY OF HER CONTENTIONS re her doggerel about the Higgs Boson.

AINSLIE, in short, is full of lies, errors, and outright fraud, as is illustrated by the story of the CORRECT SCHEMATIC used in the DEMONSTRATION VIDEO and her attempts to cover it up.

And AINSLIE continues her morbid fantasies about Pickles.

What AINSLIE CANNOT DO, in addition to the above failures on her part, is to provide ANY of the testing she's promised for over a year and a half now. She cannot show IN ANY WAY that my experimentation is in any way flawed, while I can and have demonstrated OVER AND OVER AGAIN that Ainslie does not have the knowledge or the ability or the skills or the attitude to carry out valid experimental research or report on it. There is NO RAW DATA from Ainslie. There are CLAIMS that are instantly refuted simply by examining her associated scope traces. There is CONSTANT math error and CONTINUAL garbling of terminology on the part of AINSLIE. Yet she is so overweeningly arrogant that she doesn't even clean up after herself, like a senile old woman that can't even wipe her own.... dishes.

And "Yousaidwhat" is a sock puppet of the worst, smelly kind: one who cannot contribute ANYTHING of her own and so must post nonsense from Ainslie that is spewed forth without a shred of evidence or support.

Here's a pickle for you both, you idiot trolls.

[TinselKoala]

Have a sniff over here...

No battery, No Cap,  No power source

Runs a load ..........

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4864-donald-smith-devices-too-good-true-258.html#post213894

Thx
Chet

Well... it's really hard to tell what his circuit is in that video... since he has no schematic for the usual mess of clipleads, the several batteries on the table, the _big_ capacitor with some clipleads going to it (silver cylinder with breadboard on top of it just to the right of the demonstration)...., but in the pages discussing the video, the schematics given for the two "simple induction heaters" and the next one showing the "old" circuit with a bunch of parallel caps on the output side and a transformer driven by an oscillator.... are almost identical to the inductive wireless power transmitter/receiver systems I've shown here several times before.

Until he shows the complete schematic, I don't see what all the excitement is all about. Certainly I could duplicate his exact performance in the video in a few minutes, right down to the meter behaviour, deliberately using my wireless power system.... if I can find all my clipleads, that is.