Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Yethh, mawthter, right awayyyyyyy.....

But about those late paychecks..... really now, we are supposed to be yer Lerdship's "well-paid" minions, aren't we? You wouldn't want us lot to defect to the other side, where the payoff is supposed to be infinite.... would you? So come on, tell that lazy paymaster of yours to start cutting us some checks.

[TinselKoala]

"When I see omission of comments on my posts at OU.com I KNOW I've hit a home run."

This just might be another little dig..... if what gmeast says is true, that Ainslie/Krebs's "Brian Little" nemesis is a professional baseball player.
Too bad Maria Krebs herself... or Rose "Mary" Ainslie or whoever she claims to be this week.... is definitely playing in her local Little League and can't hope to compete with real players anywhere.

[TinselKoala]

Do you see? It is just as I told you.

The ignorant lying troll Krebs-Ainslie makes words mean whatever she wants them to mean, not what the dictionary says they mean, and we are supposed to read her mind to try to sort out the boldfaced lies from the mere mendacious implications.

Only in the twisted mind of Ainslie nee Krebs could claiming "no measurable discharge" NOT mean claiming that "the batteries do not deplete".

And once again she repeats the lie about her measurements NOT finding any "depletion of potential", when I've clearly shown USING HER OWN MEASUREMENTS that that claim is false.

There was no attempt made in these tests to precisely quantify the energy delivered by the battery as this relates to the measured rise of temperature over the resistor element. This was based on the fact that in all tests  and, notwithstanding variations to the frequency and offset adjustments, the results show a zero discharge of energy from the battery supply. Therefore, any measured rise in temperature over ambient on the resistor element is seen as being anomalous.

ZERO DISCHARGE OF ENERGY FROM THE BATTERY SUPPLY. FACT. IN ALL TESTS.

Now she is claiming that THIS CLAIM is NOT a claim that the batteries do not deplete !! Just what planet is she from, anyway? Did the unhappy events in Joburg addle Ainslie-Krebs's brain so much that she no longer knows what words even MEAN?

Ah..... words mean whatever she wants them to mean, and will change from day to day.

[TinselKoala]

Oh... and before I forget.... Here's still more evidence for Ainslie's ignorance, her arrogance, and her idiocy: She misspells doggerel as "doggeral" on her forum, and when this was pointed out to her THE FIRST DAY of that thread.... she simply ignored her error and continues to make it.

[TinselKoala]

From the Quantum paper. Is this not a claim that the batteries do not deplete? Or is it just a claim that they failed to measure the batteries depleting? Ainslie-Krebs has been reduced to making semantic maneuvers worthy of a two-dollar politician, attempting now to claim that she hasn't been claiming what she's been claiming, all along.

Would you like a fine net, or a coarse net, when you go fishing for eels?

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT BATTERY VOLTAGE REDUCTION .... if this is not a claim that the batteries did not deplete (significantly), then it must be a statement that THE MEASUREMENTS ARE IN ERROR, because if the measurements are correct (and the report is honest, which it is not) then the batteries must not have depleted, otherwise they would not have produced those measurements.

This is a clear claim, in Ainslie-Krebs's first and only _actual_ publication on this matter, that her batteries did not deplete "significantly" during the course of the experiment.