Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

I was wrong in calling you a "jerk". I'm sorry.

Apology noted. Will change in behaviour result? What about the "verbal diarrhoea", the "pop like a zit".... still feeling like those are appropriate responses to me?

As far as 'refuting' you goes, that will take care of itself in due course.  In fact, it's already happened, you're just not paying attention.

You are right... I did not notice the publication of your astounding results in a scientific journal, or the reports of replication by qualified laboratories that understand calorimetry. Link please?
And I didn't find, anywhere, anything that refutes my contention and proofs that Ainslie is a liar. Link?

As far as this Bryan Little stuff goes, anyone by that name knows that it would be stupid to try and claim any defamation or damages whatsoever.  Why,  because there has to be exposure to legitimize any claim of damage as well as intent to defame the 'real' Bryan Little ... and that intent ain't there.  The exposure here is zero, zip, nada, etc.  Ask 100 people on the street if they've ever heard of free energy, alternative energy, radiant energy, magnetic vortices, Overunity.com or, least of all, TK or TinselKoala.  Ask that question and you'll only get an answer of "HUH ?*%#$@". No one's listening because no one cares.

Rosemary Ainslie obviously cares, and is obviously trying to damage that particular Bryan (or Brian) Little in whatever way she can. Why do you think she went through the rigamarole of "revealing" that as her deluded identification of my identity, including the imaginary "fact" that I'm in Kentucky (or was it Tennessee) at the University there? And do you seriously think that these forums are the only places Ainslie emits out her vile canards? Just like you are, she's a great emailer, and has tried to identify people's employers and families, for her email campaigns. I think I understand Ainslie's motivations better than you do.... after all she's been attacking me for pointing out her false claims, lies, ignorance of her topic, and bad writing for around four years now.... and for some others here, for over TWELVE years. You are a freshman, a noob, when it comes to understanding the psychology of Rosemary Ainslie. Speaking of psychology.... I wonder how many professional baseball players moonlight as psychologists? Or is it the other way around.....

Found this:
"Tinsel: something superficially attractive or glamorous but of little real worth  ......."
You should think more of yourself ... oh! that's right you already do.

Well... I do, or I don't... which is it? Unlike some people, I know where my limitations lie, I know that I can always learn something and that I don't know everything about most things.... and I also know that I do know just about everything about one or two things that you know nothing at all about. I'm always ready to revise my knowledge when confronted with facts and references, and I certainly am NOT arrogant enough to believe that I've got an overunity device on my workbench.... four, right now in fact, all using different principles.... because I get some kind of result that looks anomalous to me. My very FIRST and usually correct assumption is that I've made a mistake somewhere.

I'd explain the history of my alias to you - as if you cared - but that would require you to understand the story of Archer Quinn, and the literary use of irony to make a point. The story of Quinn and his "Sword of God" is long gone, but my username here remains.  I kind of like it.... I always watch for when my impotent enemies quote a dictionary definition of "tinsel" to me. I could have used "silent".... but I have no intention of being silent when I see the kinds of abuse that people like Quinn, and Ainslie, and Mylow, and others wreak on the whole program of alternate energy research. You really should strive to avoid joining that group, by cleaning up your experimental act and doing your homework a bit more thoroughly.

Oh well, back to my 'fakery' of proving the heater actually works.

Here I will point out that "fakery" is your term and that no one that I know of has ever accused _you_ of data falsification or of faking anything. Can you provide a link to something I've missed?

You have, though, made a lot of errors, caused by simple ignorance, made extravagant claims based on those errors, (some of which, not all, have been corrected) and you've avoided taking good advice, caused by your arrogance. You really should submit a paper on your work to a legitimate journal, just to see what feedback you get from the editors.

[gmeast]

"You are right... I did not notice the publication of your astounding results in a scientific journal, or the reports of replication by qualified laboratories that understand calorimetry. Link please?And I didn't find, anywhere, anything that refutes my contention and proofs that Ainslie is a liar. Link?"


Oh... you are referring to your notion that Rosie is a liar.  I don't know anything about that and don't care either. I thought you were referring to the notion that the heater doesn't actually work. Well, the heater DOES actually work and produces more energy (and power) OUT in the form of equivalent Heat than is INPUT in electrical energy (and power), albeit not at COP Infinity or COP>17, or 10, or 5, but it does perform a COP>1 as hard as that is for you to accept.  And this is for my hardware, not the same as hers, or yours, etc.


So I made many mistakes at the onset of these investigations.  And saying it right here and now, is AGAIN an admission of that AND still goes UNACKNOWLEDGED by you guys (as if I need your approval in the first place). Speaking of arrogance, you and your band of self righteous slammed me to the mat hard and viciously, so I shut you out.  But I do thank you for pointing out the 'oscillation / scope ground loop' thing. I don't tune for the oscillations anyway.


I'm NOT aligned with Rosie in any way, and, in fact, she recommends that I distance myself from her for my own good so I don't end up on the receiving end of the kind of treatment you have hurled her way (her words).  Well, if I do distance myself, I won't be employing YOUR insensitive and inhumane tactics.


BUT ... in spite of EVERYTHING, I'm still glad I invested in this research because what I have seen from the last few experiments tells me this technology is real, viable, valid and practical ... worthy of further investigation and perhaps even worthy of a preliminary effort aimed at some sort of product development.

[MileHigh]

perhaps even worthy of a preliminary effort aimed at some sort of product development.

How about a personal wireless hotspot and cellphone jammer that is also a coffee cup heater?  lol

[orbut 3000]

There should be no 'us' and 'them', no hurt egos. Only facts, measurements, math and a grain of common sense. Otherwise, it's COP>insanity.


If something doesn't add up, I would first look, very hard, for the error in my calculation instead of declaring math obsolete.

[gmeast]

There should be no 'us' and 'them', no hurt egos. Only facts, measurements, math and a grain of common sense. Otherwise, it's COP>insanity.


If something doesn't add up, I would first look, very hard, for the error in my calculation instead of declaring math obsolete.

Who declared math obsolete?