Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

@PW:

I'll have as much time as I need, don't worry about that. That is, unless something exciting has happened with (redacted). But the chances of that, IMHO, are on a par with Ainslie's.

And I'd like to read the manual, yes; I'm actually not afraid of information, as long as it's not too expensive. Do you have a link to a .pdf? I couldn't find a free one that my browser liked.

[picowatt]

TK,

Are you going to use your bias source with its ground at the battery ground, as shown in .99's sim schematic which is identical to the March video?  Or are you going to connect the bias source ground to point 4 as per the schematic in the first paper?

PW

[TinselKoala]

Your LED's lit up because the resistance on the wire was enough to induce a small voltage which then collapsed as that square wave signal changed - which then produced power proportional to the square of the applied voltage on both halves of that square wave applied signal.  You drove your motor on precisely those same principles.  So.  TK.  Let us know how you managed to defeat Faraday's Laws of Induction.

Every time I think that you can't possibly come up with anything else as stupid as some of the things you've said... you prove me wrong again.

This is unbelievable. We are trying to discuss electronics with someone from the Bizarro Universe who thinks that a FG turns a mosfet on by electromagnetic induction, who thinks that a three-second DC pulse is somehow a "square wave".... that Agilent are totally wrong about their FGs passing or sourcing current.....

Un believe able.

ANYBODY WITH A FUNCTION GENERATOR CAN PROVE FOR THEMSELVES THAT YOU ARE WRONG in ten minutes. Or less.

[picowatt]

@PW:

I'll have as much time as I need, don't worry about that. That is, unless something exciting has happened with (redacted). But the chances of that, IMHO, are on a par with Ainslie's.

And I'd like to read the manual, yes; I'm actually not afraid of information, as long as it's not too expensive. Do you have a link to a .pdf? I couldn't find a free one that my browser liked.

TK,

How about this one:

http://www.trs-rentelco.com/Manual/TEK_DPO4034_Manual.pdf

PW

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Every time I think that you can't possibly come up with anything else as stupid as some of the things you've said... you prove me wrong again.

This is unbelievable. We are trying to discuss electronics with someone from the Bizarro Universe who thinks that a FG turns a mosfet on by electromagnetic induction, who thinks that a three-second DC pulse is somehow a "square wave".... that Agilent are totally wrong about their FGs passing or sourcing current.....

Un believe able.

ANYBODY WITH A FUNCTION GENERATOR CAN PROVE FOR THEMSELVES THAT YOU ARE WRONG in ten minutes. Or less.

It is YOU who refers to that wave as a 'square wave' - IN YOUR VIDEO.  A function generator most CERTAINLY either allows or prevents current flow from the circuit supply - depending on the transistor type - and by APPLYING A SIGNAL - NOT A DISCHARGE OF CURRENT.  And I do not give a tuppeny damn about what you 'CLAIM' is within the capabilities of a function generator.  It CANNOT pass a current flow.  It can ONLY enable an INDUCED current flow. 

That's it.  Contradict this as often a you please.  You are WRONG.

Again and ever,
Rosie Pose