Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 159 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Thank you for stating that so clearly, PW.

I hope that my earlier comment about the gate of Q2 therefore being _relatively_ positive wrt the negative voltage applied to the source is also clear in this context.

It's easy to see this when the floating external battery supply is used: the positive of that battery goes to the gates of Q2 -- which is always indeed at circuit ground -- and the negative goes to the sources. But because of the way the circuit is wired, this external battery (or substitute like FG or 555 timer) is in series with the main battery whenever and to whatever extent the Q2 mosfets are conducting.

However, as usual, Ainslie confounds several distinct cases here. Recall that we are talking about the DC case when the FG or the external supply is _strictly_ negative at the Q2 sources. But in the Ainslie experiments she is sometimes using a FG set to produce a pulse _and also_ she is offsetting that pulse with the offset control. This means that sometimes she is actually giving her circuit a bipolar pulse with the FG even when she doesn't realize it or see it in the _gate trace_ of the scopeshots (it shows in the current trace of course.)

picowatt

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 04, 2012, 01:32:54 AM
Thank you for stating that so clearly, PW.

I hope that my earlier comment about the gate of Q2 therefore being _relatively_ positive wrt the negative voltage applied to the source is also clear in this context.

It's easy to see this when the floating external battery supply is used: the positive of that battery goes to the gates of Q2 -- which is always indeed at circuit ground -- and the negative goes to the sources. But because of the way the circuit is wired, this external battery (or substitute like FG or 555 timer) is in series with the main battery whenever and to whatever extent the Q2 mosfets are conducting.

However, as usual, Ainslie confounds several distinct cases here. Recall that we are talking about the DC case when the FG or the external supply is _strictly_ negative at the Q2 sources. But in the Ainslie experiments she is sometimes using a FG set to produce a pulse _and also_ she is offsetting that pulse with the offset control. This means that sometimes she is actually giving her circuit a bipolar pulse with the FG even when she doesn't realize it or see it in the _gate trace_ of the scopeshots (it shows in the current trace of course.)

TK,

It is clear that there is a a lot that is not "realized".

Some people need to know more just to know what they don't know.

Is the Cav still running well?

PW




TinselKoala

Quote from: hartiberlin on May 02, 2012, 06:27:16 PM
Hi Rosemary,

I think it is better to make some new experiment, than to rant here all the time.

Just do the experiments and prove TK wrong if you can do this with your setup...

And show it in videos as he is showing it.

I got again some complains of some users that you only rant here and don´t do the required
experiments.


Regards, Stefan

The owner of this web forum tells Ainslie:

Just do the experiments and prove TK wrong if you can do this with your setup....
And show it in videos as he is showing it.


But Rosemary completely ignores this and continues with her personal attacks, veiled threats and self-contradictions, while continuing to refuse to address or correct the three latest major errors that I have been asking her about. And she gives no evidence or support for the things she claims.


Rosemary Ainslie

Guys with regard to this...
Quote from: TinselKoala on May 04, 2012, 01:38:12 AM
The owner of this web forum tells Ainslie:

Just do the experiments and prove TK wrong if you can do this with your setup....
And show it in videos as he is showing it.


But Rosemary completely ignores this and continues with her personal attacks, veiled threats and self-contradictions, while continuing to refuse to address or correct the three latest major errors that I have been asking her about. And she gives no evidence or support for the things she claims.
TK, Picowatt, MileHigh, FTC are CONSTANTLY referring to ME.  With every reference they entitle me to defend whatever is erroneous in that reference.  Else I would have no voice which is what TK is hoping to manage.  And we all know why.

Kindest as ever
Rosemary

TinselKoala

Quote from: picowatt on May 04, 2012, 01:37:43 AM
TK,

It is clear that there is a a lot that is not "realized".

Some people need to know more just to know what they don't know.

Is the Cav still running well?

PW
Heh... well said, and that certainly applies to me as well; I've certainly learned a lot over the past couple of months that I didn't know I didn't know. Or maybe I'd forgot that I didn't know, or didn't know I'd forgot. Or something.

And probably didn't really need to know, or remember, either, but there it is.

Yes, the car is still running fine, scary cool, when I can afford to put gas in it. I didn't make the intended trip today though; maybe tomorrow. I want to get some solid mean power results using IRF830as and I'm too lazy to do it manually again.

Voltages are relative:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIjC7DjoVe8